Laserfiche WebLink
regarding what should have been taken into account. He added that he also has <br />pictures of signage which will also support their position and which will clearly <br />demonstrate that these signs have been in place for years, showing that both Sycamore <br />and Bridle Creek are the designated areas, and that there is absolutely no signage <br />along Lund Ranch Road indicating that this is to be a connection to Lund Ranch II. <br />Randy Harris, representing the Foley family, stated that the Foley family's 540 -acre <br />property abuts Lund Ranch. He indicated that they were in discussions years ago, prior <br />to the passage of the Measures, to work with the City to locate a park on the Foley <br />property. He noted that there is to be a limited development on the property, and the <br />Foleys would still like to work with the City to help locate a park in a very nice location <br />within their property. He requested that the Commission take that into consideration as <br />the City moves forward with this development. <br />Laurie Saxton stated that she totally agrees with everybody from Junipero Street, that <br />everybody cutting through Independence Drive during morning, afternoon, and evening <br />traffic is a nightmare. She indicated that she is directly impacted by this upcoming <br />development that might go through Ventana Hills because the road that goes up to <br />Bonde was supposed to be a temporary road. She added that it is a very steep road <br />and when she is trying to back out of her driveway, she looks back and before she can <br />pull out, somebody comes flying down Hopkins Way, and drivers slow down because it <br />is a steep hill but they do not stop at the stop sign between Hopkins Way and <br />Independence Drive. She indicated that these people are not part of the neighborhood <br />and they totally disrespect the neighborhood laws in terms of speed limits and stopping <br />at the stop sign, so it is quite a dangerous situation even for the people who live there. <br />She also indicated that Lund Ranch Road was never supposed to be the access road <br />and was never ever in any previous plans; in fact, it was totally taken out of the picture. <br />She noted that it is a very steep hill and is an emergency access road. <br />Jay Hertogs stated that he lives in the neighborhood but does not know anything about <br />the Lund Ranch development because he has never received any cards about the <br />development. He indicated that the City's traffic study of their street states that <br />2,400 cars go by daily, and he expressed concern that this development would definitely <br />drop another 300 to 400 more cars going by their house, which is ridiculous. He noted <br />that there is so much traffic in the morning between 6:00 a.m. and 9:00 a.m. that his <br />wife cannot even back out of their own driveway; and in the evening, they cannot even <br />sit in the living room with the window open in the summertime when it is a nice evening <br />because there is so much noise that they cannot even read or hear the TV. He asked <br />the Commission to really consider having the traffic go somewhere else. <br />Scott Shafer stated that he has lived in Pleasanton for about 25 years and in the area <br />for the past nine years. He indicated his support for Mr. Albritten's statement about the <br />Committee and noted that there is a traffic concern, but he would like to bring up other <br />issues specific to his property. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 14, 2012 Page 19 of 35 <br />