My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
PC 020812
City of Pleasanton
>
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS
>
PLANNING
>
MINUTES
>
2010-2019
>
2012
>
PC 020812
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2017 3:14:47 PM
Creation date
8/10/2017 2:30:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
MINUTES
DOCUMENT DATE
2/8/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
reaction to diffuse the situation by separating the persons involved from the rest of the <br />club and taking them into a hallway to a back exit. <br />Commissioner Blank noted that he did not see and may have missed the condition <br />mentioned by Mr. Mull specifying the required number of security officers. <br />Mr. Mull replied that he did not see that either but that during the last meeting they had <br />last week, it was reiterated that they were still at the one security person per 50 patrons. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired if that ratio is per the industry standard. <br />Mr. Mull replied that the industry standard is actually one person per 100 patrons. He <br />noted that they are willing and very happy to go above that. <br />Commissioner Blank asked if the ratio on the night of the shooting incident was one per <br />28. <br />Mr. Mull replied that was probably correct. <br />Commissioner Blank inquired if the conclusion was that at least it was sufficient for that <br />evening. <br />Mr. Mull replied that there were fights that broke out in the club and were immediately <br />dealt with and moved outside the club. He noted, however, that no number of officers <br />could have prevented somebody from driving by and taking a shot at somebody, even if <br />there were one hundred officers. He noted further that there were Pleasanton Police <br />Officers nearby and were there when the incident took place, so it was not necessarily a <br />breakdown in their security staff in any way that led to that unfortunate incident. <br />Commissioner Pearce noted that Mr. Mull mentioned that a scanner has been used for <br />checking ID's at the club. She inquired how readily available the data from that scanner <br />would be in case there were an incident. <br />Mr. Mull replied that he believed the data are immediately available with the new <br />scanner that was purchased right after this incident occurred. He stated that in their <br />meeting with the Police Chief, they indicated that they would make that data as well as <br />footage from the video camera system immediately available upon request right then <br />and there. He added, however, that he is not sure if they might have to scroll through <br />500 different data points to find something. <br />Commissioner Pearce verified that it is immediately accessible, nevertheless. should an <br />incident occur. <br />Mr. Mull said yes. <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, February 8, 2012 Page 10 of 23 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.