My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
062017
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/14/2017 4:49:45 PM
Creation date
6/14/2017 3:24:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/20/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Based on these concerns about shared indoor air and drifting smoke outdoors, the <br /> proposed ordinance prohibits smoking inside of all units, in patios and balconies <br /> exclusively serving any unit, in all common indoor and outdoor areas, and in areas of a <br /> complex that are within 25 feet of doors, windows, air vents, or any of the places where <br /> smoking is prohibited. For example, a resident or guest may not smoke outside within 25 <br /> feet of an apartment complex pool area [as the pool area is a common area where <br /> smoking is prohibited]. However, a resident may smoke while walking on a public <br /> sidewalk adjacent to an apartment complex even if within 25 feet of an apartment window, <br /> as the public sidewalk is not part of the apartment complex. <br /> 2. Whether to allow smoking inside some units. There was discussion about whether an <br /> apartment complex with multiple residential buildings should be allowed to have one <br /> residential building where tenants can smoke inside of their units. There was also <br /> consideration of permitting existing tenants whose leases allow smoking to be able to <br /> continue with the same lease terms. <br /> While the physical separation of a building where smoking is allowed was discussed, the <br /> final Housing Commission recommendation, interest of owners and managers, and public <br /> health advocates, is that tenants should be subject to the same rules, and concentrating <br /> smokers would create increased secondhand smoke concerns. Therefore, the proposed <br /> ordinance does not provide for buildings where smoking is allowed, nor exemptions for <br /> existing tenants. (See 9. Timing to implement, below, for some additional time for <br /> restrictions to go into effect for existing tenants who are smokers.) <br /> 3. Minimum number of units to be subject to restrictions. As the Council Priority is <br /> focused on multifamily rental housing, and the health concerns stemming from shared <br /> indoor air and walls, or smoke drift outdoors, the proposed ordinance would apply to rental <br /> housing with two or more units, where at least two units are being rented, and the complex <br /> is under single ownership and control.4 This threshold would address health concerns for <br /> units in close proximity, and allow for coordinated management by a single owner. <br /> 4. Outdoor smoking areas. There was an interest in providing some accommodation for <br /> smokers that would not create secondhand smoke exposure. The proposed ordinance <br /> allows a property owner to elect to establish an outdoor smoking area at least 25 feet <br /> from non-smoking areas, with requirements for signage and waste disposal. The waste <br /> disposal element was recommended by apartment managers who have existing smoking <br /> areas. As this is a voluntary option for an owner. <br /> 5. How to treat marijuana. Many opinions were expressed regarding medical and <br /> recreational marijuana. As persons using medical marijuana are supposed to be under <br /> doctor recommendation, to accommodate such medical concerns, the proposed <br /> ordinance allows persons to use medical marijuana inside of their unit. Such a resident <br /> 'In addition to regulations in the proposed new Ch. 9.26 (Attachment 1), there is also a unifying <br /> amendment to §9.26.060 (also in Attachment 1) clarifying the difference between private <br /> residences and connected rentals of 2 or more units with common ownership and management. <br /> Page 4 of 6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.