Laserfiche WebLink
Notices were sent to about 22 people for the April 20, 2017 Housing Commission meeting, <br /> and to about 38 people for this City Council meeting. <br /> The vast majority of persons coming to the owner and manager meetings, directly <br /> contacting staff, attending the Housing Commission meeting [Attachment 3 is the <br /> Commission's April 20, 2017 report], and sending their comments [Attachment 4], support <br /> restrictions on smoking in multifamily rental apartments. In addition to concerns about <br /> secondhand smoke, owners and managers also discussed: how a smoke-free policy is <br /> an effective marketing tool; most residents are non-smokers; even in complexes where <br /> smoking is already restricted smokers have found ways to follow the rules and smoke by <br /> walking outside of the complex; enforcement against tenants and guests who violate no <br /> smoking rules; and ability to change terms of lease upon renewal (not mid-lease). While <br /> a few shared that their apartments allow smoking in specific buildings or permit smoking <br /> outdoors, the significant majority support smoking restrictions. <br /> Environmental Review. As the proposed ordinance will only restrict smoking activities <br /> within an already built environment, there is no possibility that the ordinance could have <br /> a significant effect on the environment. Therefore, the proposed ordinance is exempt <br /> from review under the California Environmental Quality Act(CEQA) per Title 14 California <br /> Code of Regulations §15061(b)(3). <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The adopted Council Priority is to "Improve public health and safety by prohibiting <br /> smoking within rental multifamily housing." Considering secondhand smoke exposure as <br /> the significant public health concern,3 staff reviewed existing public health information, <br /> compared regulations in nearby communities, and sought recommendations from the <br /> Housing Commission. <br /> Attachment 2 is a chart outlining key policy considerations, how each is addressed in the <br /> proposed ordinance, the recommendations of the Housing Commission, and current <br /> regulations in Danville, Dublin, Livermore and San Ramon. The rationale supporting each <br /> policy in the proposed ordinance is described below. <br /> 1. Areas to prohibit smoking. To prevent secondhand smoke exposure,the policy interest <br /> is to prohibit smoking in areas where residents share ventilation systems, walls through <br /> which secondhand smoke can permeate and the air of indoor common spaces (common <br /> hallway, laundry room, mail room, etc.). In addition, as multifamily housing often involves <br /> multistory buildings with no space between units, a person smoking on a balcony or patio <br /> can have their smoke drift to an upstairs, downstairs or adjacent unit. Even persons <br /> smoking walking through an unenclosed hallway, parking lot or walkway, if near another <br /> residents' doors,windows, or air ducts, can have their smoke travel into another residents' <br /> apartment. <br /> In the proposed ordinance [Attachment 11 there are health and safety findings supporting <br /> adoption of these smoking restrictions set forth in Exhibit B. <br /> Page 3 of 6 <br />