Laserfiche WebLink
THE CITY OF 11 <br /> { CITY COUNCIL AGENDA REPORT <br /> pL£ASANTONm <br /> June 6, 2017 <br /> Fire <br /> TITLE: AUTHORIZE THE CITY MANAGER TO SIGN A FIVE (5) YEAR EXTENSION <br /> TO THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY AND THE ALAMEDA <br /> COUNTY FIRE DEPARTMENT (ACFD) FOR ACFD TO PROVIDE <br /> EMERGENCY DISPATCH AND REGIONAL COMMUNICATIONS THROUGH <br /> THE ALAMEDA COUNTY REGIONAL EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS <br /> CENTER WITH AN ANNUAL NOT-TO-EXCEED AMOUNT OF $316,000 <br /> SUMMARY <br /> In 2012, the cities of Pleasanton and Livermore entered into identical five (5) year <br /> agreements with the Alameda County Fire Department (ACFD) for ACFD to provide <br /> emergency dispatch and regional communications through the Alameda County <br /> Regional Emergency Communications Center (ACRECC). The term of the agreement <br /> was from July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2017. The agreement allows for an extension of an <br /> additional five (5) years upon mutual agreement between the parties. After discussions <br /> with the City of Pleasanton, the City of Livermore, the Livermore-Pleasanton Fire <br /> Department and ACFD, staff is requesting that the Council authorize the City Manager <br /> to sign the five (5) year extension (Attachment 1). The extension term is from July 1, <br /> 2017 to June 30, 2022. <br /> RECOMMENDATION <br /> It is recommended that the City Council authorize the City Manager to sign a five (5) <br /> year extension to the agreement between the City and ACFD regarding the regional <br /> emergency communications center and fire dispatch services. <br /> FINANCIAL STATEMENT <br /> Attachment 2 details the estimated dispatch costs for each city for five (5) year <br /> extension period as calculated by ACFD. Costs are split based on the number of calls <br /> specific to each city. Costs rise each year due to the rising cost-per-call. The not-to- <br /> exceed amount noted in the extension, $316,000, is based on cost estimates for the last <br /> year of the extension and is approximately 5% higher than the highest estimated annual <br /> cost; staff expects the actual costs to align closely with the projections detailed in <br /> Attachment 2. <br />