My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18 ATTACHMENT 09
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
050217
>
18 ATTACHMENT 09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/28/2017 12:20:19 PM
Creation date
4/28/2017 12:16:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/2/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18 ATTACHMENT 9
Document Relationships
18
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 08
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
278
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
and picnic areas, they also have "active" recreation features such as lighted sports facilities <br /> (sport fields, tennis courts, and swimming pools), community/recreation centers, off-street <br /> parking, and restrooms. <br /> Some Neighborhood Parks, due to their location, are more frequently used by the entire <br /> community, which sometimes warrants the need for additional amenities. Examples of City <br /> Neighborhood Parks where design exceptions have been made to provide for amenities (such <br /> as restrooms) include Lions Wayside and Delucchi Parks, Stoneridge Creek Neighborhood Park <br /> and Creekside Park. All of those exceptions have been made to account for special <br /> circumstances, as described in the Planning Commission Work Session staff report (Exhibit D). <br /> In general, the City has been reluctant to take on maintenance of new (and unplanned) buildings <br /> given the City's long-term facilities strategy and approved master planning efforts. However, the <br /> Planning Commission can recommend whether the City Council should support the applicant's <br /> proposal to construct a bathroom and offer funding assistance for maintenance. Staff notes that <br /> the restrooms, if supported by Council, would be subject to a separate City review process <br /> through the Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council. <br /> Architecture and Design <br /> As previously discussed, the applicant is proposing five house models, which include two one- <br /> story models and three two-story models. Each model would have varying elevation styles <br /> (Bungalow, Cottage, and/or Ranch). Each elevation style would utilize a combination of stucco <br /> and/or wood siding and provide three exterior color schemes for a total of nine color schemes. <br /> Overall, staff believes that the proposed homes are adequately designed and provide enough <br /> interest and variation. The architectural styles and heights of the proposed homes are also <br /> compatible with those of the homes in the surrounding neighborhood, which include a mix of <br /> one-story and two-story homes. <br /> Traffic <br /> The purpose of a Transportation Impact Analysis (TIA) is to provide sufficient information <br /> concerning the impacts of a project on the transportation system and to determine appropriate <br /> mitigation measures where impacts would occur. The City's TIA Guidelines are used by <br /> developers and consultants for the preparation of all TIAs. <br /> General criteria for determining whether a TIA is warranted include: <br /> • Project generates 100 or more vehicle trips during the AM or PM peak hour. <br /> • Project generates 40 or more vehicle trips through an existing intersection operating at <br /> Level of Service (LOS) D. <br /> • Project generates 10 or more vehicle trips through an existing intersection operating at <br /> LOS E or F. <br /> • Project that changes existing land use in general or master plan. <br /> Trip generation for single-family homes is less than one trip per household in the morning and <br /> one trip in the evening; therefore, the project would not generate more than 36 trips during the <br /> AM and PM peak times. The Valley Trails Drive and Hopyard Road intersection currently <br /> operates at LOS C and the Hopyard Road and Stoneridge Drive intersection has a LOS of D <br /> during the PM peak hour. Therefore, the project would not contribute 40 or more trips to an <br /> intersection operating at LOS C or D. There no LOS E or F intersections along Hopyard Road. <br /> P16-1386, P17-0155, PUD-113, & TRACT 8259; 6900 Valley Trails Drive Planning Commission <br /> 22 of 32 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.