My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
18
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2017
>
050217
>
18
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/8/2017 4:14:35 PM
Creation date
4/27/2017 10:20:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/2/2017
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
18
Document Relationships
18 ATTACHMENT 08
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 09
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
18 ATTACHMENT 12
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2017\050217
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
155
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Ponderosa Homes at 6900 Valley Trails Drive <br /> Initial Study and Negative Declaration <br /> to hard fat clay to a depth of approximately 20 to 23 feet, underlain by very <br /> stiff to hard lean clay with varying percentages of sand. Plasticity Index tests <br /> indicated that there is extremely high plasticity and expansion potential to <br /> wetting and drying cycles. <br /> Expansive soils can undergo significant volume changes in moisture content. <br /> They shrink and harden when dried, and expand and soften when wetted. To <br /> mitigate these potential impacts to acceptable levels and ensure that <br /> foundation systems are capable of tolerating or resisted potential damaging <br /> soil movements, the geotechnical report recommends several measures to <br /> be implemented into the design of foundations, irrigation and site drainage, <br /> and surface improvements; and during site preparations, including over- <br /> excavation of soils. These measures are required to be implemented, to the <br /> satisfaction of the City Engineer, as conditions of project approval. Therefore, <br /> the potential impact would be categorized as less than significant. <br /> e) No septic systems or alternative wastewater disposal systems are proposed as <br /> part of the project; therefore, it would have no impact. <br /> 5.7. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS <br /> Less Than <br /> Significant <br /> Potentially Impact With Less Than <br /> Significant Mitigation Significant No <br /> Issues Impact Incorporated Impact Impact <br /> Would the project: <br /> a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions,either directly or X <br /> indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the <br /> environment? <br /> b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation X <br /> adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of <br /> greenhouse gases? <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING <br /> Assembly Bill (AB) 32 mandates that local governments adopt strategies to reduce <br /> greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Consistent with the objectives of AB 32, the City <br /> has adopted a Climate Action Plan (CAP) to outline strategies to reduce GHG <br /> emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2020. The CAP has been reviewed by the Bay <br /> Area Quality Management District and deemed a "Qualified Greenhouse Gas <br /> Reduction Strategy" in accordance with the District's CEQA guidelines. <br /> 24 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.