Laserfiche WebLink
Downtown Parking Strategy and Implementation Plan—Public Comments ATTACHMENT 3 <br /> 1. Parking garage. <br /> The grandiose public parking garage, often dreamed about for the Bank of America site <br /> or elsewhere downtown is too big,too expensive, and too slow to crank up in the time <br /> frame needed. A parking garage could be pursued and helpful in the longer run. <br /> 2. Vest pocket parking lots. <br /> The City could with relative speed provide vest pocket public parking lots. There are <br /> numerous underutilized properties downtown. Many of these underutilized properties <br /> are close to Main Street where additional parking is most needed. The Long property <br /> on St. Mary's Street recently sold. There are residential properties in the immediate <br /> vicinity of the Pastime Plaza. <br /> The Downtown Specific Plan shows a 42 space parking lot immediately behind Main <br /> Street, on Spring Street at the former Valley Humane Society property. That property <br /> lingered long on the market and sold in 2012 for$800,000. At$17,728 per in lieu <br /> space, in lieu parking fees from 42 spaces could pay$744,576 (over 90%)of that land <br /> cost. <br /> The City must be poised to respond opportunistically when openings to purchase land <br /> for parking arise. <br /> 3. Proactive pursuit of shared parking arrangements(parking assessment <br /> districts). <br /> The PDA has worked with owners on several downtown blocks trying to get shared <br /> parking arrangements under terms specified in the Downtown Specific Plan and parking <br /> ordinance. The terms involve the contributing property owners getting the right to build <br /> 500 sq. ft. of additional space per parking space in the shared parking lot(rather than <br /> the standard 300 sq. ft.) <br /> One problem is getting the unanimous or near unanimous property owner support <br /> needed to make these arrangements work. But,another factor is that the terms of trade <br /> had not been viewed as quite favorable enough, especially for those property owners <br /> who do not need more building space now. Active effort by the City, with some subsidy, <br /> may be required for this approach to work. <br /> 5 <br /> Provided to Planning Commission for March 8,2017 Meeting and City Council for April 18, 2017 Meeting 19 <br />