SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL - Laserfiche WebLink

Annette Breche&sen From: Pleasanton City Clerk SUPPLEM `T Lik\TIJ��L�Z Subject: Zoning Code Update Provided to the City Counof[ After Dlstrlbutioet of Packet From: Ellen Holmgren Die f - 13 - / 7 Sent: Friday,January 13, 2017 12 30 PM To:James Paxson < >, Mayor and City Council <citycouncil @cityofpleasantonca gov> Cc: Gerry Beaudin <gbeaudin @cityofpleasantonca gov>, Adam Weinstein <AWeinstein @cityofpleasantonca gov>, Shweta Bonn <sbonn @cityofpleasantonca gov>, Pleasanton City Clerk<pleasantoncityclerk @cityofpleasantonca gov>, Brian Dolan <bdolan @cityofpleasantonca gov> Subject: RE Zoning Code Update Dear James Paxson, Thank you for your email regarding Item No 15, Public Hearing, P16-1418, Zoning Code Update, for the Tuesday, January 17, 2017, City Council meeting This email acknowledges receipt of your email to the City Council and the City Manager Thank you again for your interest in the City of Pleasanton Sincerely yours, Ellen Holmgren, Administrative Assistant City of Pleasanton From:James Paxson f mailto ) Sent: Friday,January 13, 2017 11 34 AM To: Mayor and City Council<citycouncil @cityofpleasantonca gov> Cc: Gerry Beaudin <gbeaudin@citvofoleasantonca gov>, Adam Weinstein<AWeinstein @cityofpleasantonca gov>, Shweta Bonn <sbonn(aicityofpleasantonca gov> Subject:Zoning Code Update Honorable Mayor Thorne and Pleasanton City Councilmembers- I wanted to provide a few additional comments on the Zoning Code amendment to supplement our previous letter as I will not be able to attend the meeting on Tuesday next week First, however, Hacienda would like to reiterate its overall support for the proposed changes and express our thanks for the work that the city staff have undertaken to bring this much needed update forward Furthermore, aside from the mechanical tasks related to updating the code, city staff have done an exceptional job of reaching out to interested parties to receive their thoughts as a way of making sure that the final product is one that is both workable and responsive to those who will be using it regularly At this time, we wanted to add a few remarks relevant to the version of the amendment that will be coming before you as there have been a few alterations made since the presentation to the Planning Commission These are as follows 0 A change has been made to the proposed amendment that now provides greater clarity regarding the precedence of uses on PUD sites This clarification is greatly appreciated A similar statement is needed for the precedence of development standards as well While it is our understanding that issues surrounding updates to development standards will be dealt with in a subsequent effort, it is important that clarification be likewise made to help resolve confusion between PUD development standards and code standards as soon as possible 1