03 - Laserfiche WebLink

The addendum would focus on the following areas Air Quality—this section will revisit the project emissions spreadsheet to confirm that the revised project design would result in reduced emissions and would provide a narrative to explain that the reduced truck trips to deliver a shorter culvert and less backfill would be addressed and reduced to less than significant by the standard SMAQMD measures and Mitigation Measure AQ-1 as presented in the 2015 Initial Study Biological Resources—this section will qualitatively describe the revised project's reduced impact on Kottinger Creek in terms of wetland fill and will demonstrate that the existing Mitigation Measures BIO-1 and Bl0-2 from the 2015 Initial Study will address these impacts AECOM will work with the City and regulatory agencies to describe the potential impacts of any specific habitat creation or restoration proposed as part of B1O-2 Cultural Resources—this section will briefly revise the extent of grading and excavation needed in Kottinger Creek and the adjacent parks and will show that the existing mitigation measures (CUL-1 through CUL-3)will reduce any impacts on cultural resources to less than significant Noise—this section would revisit the scope and locations of construction, the types of construction equipment that would be used, and the distances between the revised construction locations and noise- sensitive receptors This section would demonstrate that no new loud construction techniques would be used (e g , pile driving), estimate the reduction in noise levels at sensitive receptor locations given the reduced project footprint, and show that the existing Mitigation Measure NOI-1 would reduce any impacts to less than significant Transportation—this section would revisit the truck trip calculations presented in the Initial Study and would demonstrate that the City's adopted Mitigation Measures TRA-1 (traffic management plan) and TRA-2 (road and bike trail repairs)would reduce any traffic impacts to less than significant Prepare Final Addendum AECOM would meet with the City to discuss comments on the administrative draft addendum and resolutions to those comments before preparing the final addendum Our team understands that time is of the essence for completing this document to meet the City's desired schedule and we are committed to start work immediately and prepare the required technical evaluations upon receipt of the revised project description information Assumptions • Our proposal and cost estimate assume that the City would provide any revised drawings needed for the addendum that are not produced by AECOM • Meetings will be conducted by phone unless otherwise requested by the City Attendance at in person meetings may require a budget amendment Task Cost $9,295 Task 12 Regulatory Permitting Application Package Revision Based on the new alternative and revised project description, AECOM will revise the Joint Aquatic Resources Permit Application Package for re-submittal to the agencies Re-submittal of a complete package will facilitate agency reviews and help prevent delays in the permitting process We have also included time under this task to prepare engineering design drawings to the 30% level including all calculations and information needs required for the revised permitting package Task Cost $15,090 2