Laserfiche WebLink
Annette Brecheusen <br /> Subject: FW Tennis Court Alternatives for Tennis and Community Park <br /> P 7°gist 10 `;;-© UV C L7e: <br /> From:William L.Williams ZWter [I3 g` oC„- Gr_ ©r FE,�ISSs <br /> Sent:Sunday, December 04, 2016 6:32 PM „=_12,pg_i_16:, <br /> To:Steve Kirkpatrick<skirkpatrick@cityofpleasantonca.gov <br /> Subject:Tennis Court Alternatives for Tennis and Community Park <br /> Dear Mr Kirkpatrick -- The preference among the choices is Alternative #3. From the standpoint of design and <br /> land plan Alternative #3 makes the most sense as it takes advantage of the existing horseshoe, does not impinge <br /> on the volleyball area, does not reduce parking, and provides a single feature court at the entry point to the park <br /> while fitting neatly into the existing overall site plan of the park. <br /> My wife, Carol, and I are glad that the community area of the park is being preserved, and feel all three of the <br /> choices are much preferred over the other candidate locations for two new courts. Also, we do appreciate the <br /> process that you and the city have provided in resolving this issue for our neighborhood and community. <br /> Thanks <br /> Bill and Carol Williams <br /> 25 year residents <br /> Pleasanton <br /> William L. Williams, Architect <br /> 1 <br /> 1 <br />