My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
111516
>
10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2016 3:13:17 PM
Creation date
11/10/2016 11:25:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/15/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
7 <br />■ <br /> Christy Leffall, ABAG <br /> Page 2 <br /> January 15, 2016 <br /> 3 Anticipated Growth in Housing Element.,The Citywide projections provided in July <br /> 2015 were consistent with the rate of growth anticipated in the City's Housing Element <br /> (an increase of 28% in households over the 30 year period) This 28% increase over <br /> the 30 year time period was based on ABAG Data profiles for Housing Elements 2013 <br /> However, scenarios 1, 2, and 3 represent a Citywide increase of 41%, 43%, and 38%, <br /> respectively, representing a significant departure from the City's Housing Element, and <br /> from ABAG's previous projections Thus, we believe the growth rates of all three <br /> scenarios are not consistent with the City's existing planning documents and should be <br /> revised accordingly <br /> 4 Hacienda. Hacienda os identified as a PDA. While Hacienda is not a planned or <br /> confirmed PDA, we understand ABAG has identified it as a potential PDA As noted in <br /> our comments in response to the July 2015 estimate, the rate of growth projected in <br /> Hacienda far surpasses the rate of growth projected elsewhere in the City, as it is <br /> estimated at 300% compared to a Citywide rate of about 40% Of the total number of <br /> units identified in the current Housing Element, approximately 57% are located within <br /> Hacienda It could be argued that modest increased growth in Hacienda compared to <br /> the remainder of the City appears appropriate due to the access to BART, employment <br /> opportunities, and other factors, but we are concerned that such high levels of growth <br /> are not realistic for the existing business park, particularly given the limited number of <br /> developable sites <br /> 5 Specific Metrics. As indicated in our response to the July 2015 projections, it would <br /> be helpful to understand the metrics used to determine both the Citywide and <br /> Hacienda projections Additionally, if feasible, it would be helpful to obtain details on <br /> the comprehensive analytical process used to develop detailed geographic <br /> distributions of the regional forecast for each scenario, and details of Pleasanton's <br /> simulation on the UrbanSim modeling tool Please provide these metrics so we can <br /> review them <br /> As you know, Pleasanton has a high standard for planning, and the adopted growth <br /> management ordinance was designed to meter growth in a way that allows for the City to <br /> maintain its desired level of service While the City understands its role in helping meet the <br /> projected regional demand for housing and employment, we believe the growth rates in all <br /> three scenarios would compromise the objective of allowing for metered growth that allows us <br /> to maintain existing service levels <br /> 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.