My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
10
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
111516
>
10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/10/2016 3:13:17 PM
Creation date
11/10/2016 11:25:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
11/15/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
10
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr Ken Kirkey <br /> Page 2 <br /> November 15,2016 <br /> Table 2: September 2016 Draft Preferred Scenario—PDA Hacienda <br /> Households Employment <br /> Plan :ay Area 2013 Growth Proposed Projection 2010 2040 2010 2040 <br /> Priority Development Area(Hacienda) 1,300 8,000 12,500 19,600 <br /> 2010-2040 Change(30 Years) 6,700 7,100 <br /> Number Per Year(Over 30 Years) 223 237 <br /> 2010-2040 Percentage Change 515% 57% <br /> Average Percentage Change Per Year 17% 2% <br /> The Draft Preferred Scenario represents a significant departure from the anticipated growth in the <br /> City's General Plan, including Pleasanton's adopted and State certified Housing Element, as well as <br /> from previous projections provided by ABAG Additionally, the growth projected for the Hacienda <br /> Business Park (Hacienda)—an average annual growth rate of 17% a year—is unrealistic and oddly <br /> disproportionate to what is projected for the remainder of the City Somewhat problematic for the <br /> level of growth is that while Hacienda is shown as a Potential PDA, there is no pending plan for a <br /> long-range plan to intensify development or include more residential opportunity sites for the area <br /> Without such a long-range plan, infrastructure and public services may not be sufficient to <br /> accommodate projected growth Further, the Draft Preferred Scenario far exceeds the City's current <br /> growth management ordinance allotment of 235 residential units per year Projected annual average <br /> household growth in Pleasanton at 1 3% also outpaces ABAG's and MTC's desired growth rates for <br /> the greater Bay Area and Alameda County, which in the Draft Preferred Scenario are expected to <br /> increase by 1% and 1 1%, respectively These concerns have been communicated in previous letters <br /> sent from City staff to ABAG/MTC dated January 15, 2016, April 13, 2016, June 8, 2016, June 8, <br /> 2016, October 5, 2016, and October 13, 2016 and during a conference call between City staff ABAG <br /> staff on March 31, 2016 <br /> The City Council is respectfully requesting that MTC and ABAG staff re-examine the Draft Preferred <br /> Scenario numbers to more accurately reflect Pleasanton's planned growth <br /> Sincerely, <br /> Jerry Thorne Kathy Narum Karla Brown Arne Olson Jerry Pentin <br /> Mayor Vice Mayor Councilmember Councilmember Councilmember <br /> Cc <br /> Nelson Fialho, City Manager <br /> Gerry Beaudm, Director of Community Development <br /> Miriam Chion, ABAG, Director of Planning & Research, miriamc @abag ca gov <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.