Laserfiche WebLink
r- <br /> Messrs Paul, Jaramelio, and Shorett,ABAG <br /> Page 2 <br /> April 13, 2016 <br /> As follow-up to your suggestion, in this Better we are proposing growth rates we believe are <br /> consistent with the City's adopted planning policies and existing data <br /> 1. A City-wide increase of 235 units (households) per year, which is consistent with the <br /> City's current annual benchmark established by the growth management ordinance <br /> This results in a 28% increase over the 30 years between 2010 and 2040, and an <br /> average annual increase of about 1% <br /> 2. Please update the baseline values for Hacienda Business Park to reflect correct <br /> values for households and jobs (these are based off the U S. Census data) 1,540 <br /> households and approximately 17,000 jobs in 2010. <br /> As noted above, we believe the growth rates for all three proposed scenarios are too high <br /> While we appreciate that a future Hacienda PDA could accommodate a fair share of future <br /> growth, and conceptually support the planning framework evident in Scenano 2 (which <br /> emphasizes growth in medium-sized cities), the growth rates in each scenario are simply <br /> unrealistic for Pleasanton <br /> We thank you again for your time and look forward to receiving revised projections prior to <br /> public distnbution. <br /> Sincerely, <br /> 7/1_____<, <br /> Gerry Beaudin <br /> Director of Community Development <br /> Copy <br /> Adam Weinstein, Planning Manager <br /> Shweta Bonn, Senior Planner <br />