Laserfiche WebLink
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> Table 17. Initial Comparison of Proposed CCA Scenarios <br /> 2017 to Million$ Million$ nominal DEMAND <br /> 2030 nominal <br /> PG&E <br /> CCA Renewable Offset <br /> Investment CCA Renewable O&M Renew. <br /> Scenario <br /> Bill O&M <br /> Savings PG&E <br /> Alameda rest of offset RE Alameda <br /> Co. CA invest. Co. rest of CA Alameda <br /> roCA <br /> 1 $1,574 $623 $1,676 -$1,946 $47 $133 -$153 <br /> 2 $1,513 $623 $2,217 -$2,446 $47 $190 -$206 <br /> 3 $522 $674 $2,514 -$2,785 $51 $200 -$219 <br /> Note: Customers' bill savings account for PG&E's indifference charge, and any out-of-pocket <br /> expenditures for customer-sited renewable or efficiency projects. <br /> Job and Gross Regional Product Total Impacts <br /> The yearly profile for the county's total impacts—whether as jobs (Figure 23) or dollars of gross <br /> regional product(GRP) ( <br /> Figure 24)—shows that scenario 1 outperforms the other two scenarios. All scenarios share the <br /> year 2023 as the year of maximum positive impact which is due to maximum net rate savings. <br /> The cumulative GRP impact through 2030 for scenario 1 represents a 0.12% change relative to <br /> the county's forecasted GRP without a CCA. <br /> July,2016 36 MRW&Associates,LLC <br />