Laserfiche WebLink
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> GHG Emissions <br /> Similar to Scenarios 1 and 2,under Scenario 3, the Alameda County CCA's GHG emissions first <br /> increase from 2017 to 2019 as the CCA is phased in into the entire county. However, in Scenario <br /> 3 this increase is partially off-set by the increasing renewable content in the CCA's supply mix. <br /> Thus the CCA's emissions in this scenario grow at a slower rate from 2017 to 2019 than in the <br /> first 2 scenarios,then decrease till 80%renewable supply is achieved in 2021, and remain flat <br /> thereafter. The CCA's GHG emissions under this scenario are lower than PG&E's expected <br /> emissions for the same load if no CCA is formed. Figure 20 shows the expected GHG emissions <br /> from the CCA and PG&E for all years from 2017 to 2030. <br /> Figure 20. Scenario 3 GHG Emissions by Year("Normal" PG&E Hydro Conditions) <br /> 1,400,000 <br /> 1,200,000 <br /> 1,000,000 <br /> 800,000 <br /> H <br /> 5 <br /> 600,000 <br /> 400,000 <br /> 200,000 " <br /> 0 <br /> 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 <br /> PG&E ALAMEDA CCA <br /> July,2016 25 MRW&Associates, LLC <br />