Laserfiche WebLink
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> portfolio. However, the expected Alameda County CCA rates continue to be lower than expected <br /> PG&E generation rates for all years from 2017 to 2030. Though this positive differential still <br /> allows for the collection of reserve fund contributions through the CCA's rates in all the years <br /> under consideration,between 2026 to 2028 the differential is very small. <br /> Figure 19. Scenario 3 Rate Savings,2017-2030 <br /> 12 <br /> PG&E <br /> 10 <br /> 8 <br /> •PCIA <br /> s 4 •GHG <br /> 6 ▪O/M <br /> •Non-Renewable <br /> •Renewable <br /> 2 <br /> 0 <br /> 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 <br /> Residential Bill Impacts <br /> Table 8 below shows the average impacts on the bills of residential customers under Scenario 3. <br /> The annual bill for a residential customer on the Alameda County CCA program will be on <br /> average 3% lower(over the 2017-2030 study period) than the same customers on PG&E rates, <br /> under this scenario. <br /> Table 8. Scenario 3 Savings for Residential CCA Customers <br /> Monthly Bill with <br /> Bill with PG&E <br /> Residential Consumption Alameda Savings($) Savings(%) <br /> (kWh) County CCA($) <br /> 2017 650 147 146 1 1% <br /> 2020 650 160 154 6 4% <br /> 2030 650 201 196 5 2% <br /> July,2016 24 MRW&Associates,LLC <br />