My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
100416
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 2:23:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 2:50:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> and$80/MWh for geothermal.24 We used these prices as the starting point for our forecast of <br /> CCA renewable energy procurement costs. For geothermal, which is a relatively mature <br /> technology, we assumed that new contract prices would simply escalate with inflation. Solar and <br /> wind prices are a function of technology costs,which have generally been declining over time; <br /> financing costs, which have been very low in recent years; and tax incentives, which <br /> significantly reduce project costs, but phase out over time. In the near-term we would not expect <br /> prices to increase as technology costs and continued tax incentives provide downward pressure <br /> and likely offset any increase in financing costs or other competitive pressure from an increasing <br /> demand for renewable energy in California. Thus we have held solar and wind prices constant in <br /> nominal dollars through 2020. Beyond 2020, with increasing competitive pressure associated <br /> with the drive to a 50%RPS and the anticipated phase-out of federal tax incentives (offset in part <br /> by continued declining technology costs), we would expect prices to increase somewhat and <br /> have assumed they escalate at the rate of inflation. In addition to this base case price outlook, we <br /> also consider a high solar cost scenario based on work performed by Lawrence Berkeley <br /> Laboratory on the value of tax incentives. In the high scenario we assume that costs increase <br /> with the phase-out of federal tax incentives, without being offset by declining technology costs. <br /> Figure 11 shows the resulting solar price forecasts for the two scenarios. <br /> Figure 11. Solar Price Forecast <br /> Reported Forecasted <br /> Solar Prices Solar Prices <br /> 80 High Cost Scenario <br /> $70.98/MWh <br /> 70 <br /> 60 <br /> 50 <br /> $48.50/MWh Base Case <br /> 40 Scenario <br /> $55.44/MWh <br /> 30 <br /> 20 <br /> 10 <br /> 0 <br /> y � 'L 0 <br /> .:>1* 01 010 01 61' O1 O1' 01 O1 O61 '610› <br /> 1. 1. 'L 1, 1, 1. 1• L <br /> L <br /> 24 MRW relied exclusively on prices from municipal utilities and CCAs because investor-owned utility contract <br /> prices from this period are not yet public.We included all reported wind and solar power purchase agreements, <br /> excluding local builds(which generally come at a price premium),as reported in California Energy Markets,an <br /> independent news service from Energy Newsdata,from January 2015-January 2016(see issues dated July 31, <br /> August 14,October 16,October 30,2015,and January 15,2016). <br /> July,2016 10 MRW&Associates,LLC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.