My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
22
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
100416
>
22
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 2:23:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 2:50:37 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
21
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
164
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Community Choice Aggregation Feasibility Analysis Alameda County <br /> economic stimulation for the county creates a more pronounced set of occupational opportunities <br /> due to the magnitude of net rate savings benefitting all customer segments within the county. <br /> Figure ES-9. Occupational Impacts Scenario 1,2023 <br /> Community and social service occupations <br /> Food preparation and serving related occupations <br /> Life,physical,and social science occupations III <br /> Arts,design,entertainment,sports,and media...r <br /> Protective service occupations <br /> Legal occupations r <br /> Building and grounds cleaning and...11 <br /> Production occupations rumilm <br /> Healthcare occupations <br /> Education,training,and library occupations i <br /> Installation,maintenance,and repair occupations limn. <br /> Transportation and material moving occupations • <br /> Computer,mathematical,architecture,and engineering...- <br /> Management,business,and financial occupations <br /> Sales and related,office and administrative support... <br /> Construction and extraction occupations <br /> 0 100 200 300 400 500 600 <br /> in non-Direct •Direct <br /> Energy Efficiency <br /> The three cases each assumed approximately 6 GWh of annual incremental energy efficiency <br /> savings directly attributable to CCA efficiency program administration. This value is based on <br /> forecasts from the California Energy Commission, and take into account the savings being <br /> achieved/allocated to PG&E as well as the mandates from Senate Bill 350. <br /> A CCA has a number of options with respect to administering energy efficiency programs. First, <br /> it can rely upon PG&E to continue to all energy efficiency activities in its area,with some input <br /> to insure that monies collected from CCA customers flow back to the area. This is the path that <br /> two of the four active California CCAs have chosen(Sonoma Clean Power and Lancaster Choice <br /> Energy). Second, the CCA can apply to the CPUC to use monies collected in PG&E rates for <br /> energy efficiency programs and administration. These CCA efficiency programs can be for CCA <br /> customers only or for all customers in the CCA region, no matter their power provider. If the <br /> CCA chose the latter path, greater funds are available(including for natural gas efficiency <br /> programs). MCE Clean Energy has chosen this latter path. Our modeling assumed the more <br /> conservative former one (i.e., offer efficiency programs to only CCA-served residents and <br /> July 2016 xii MRW&Associates,LLC <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.