My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
02
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
100416
>
02
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:21:44 PM
Creation date
9/29/2016 1:42:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
10/4/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
02
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Tim Ward of Ward Architects commented on nearby transit opportunities and addressed the existing <br /> oak trees, colors, challenges with story poles, changes recommended by staff and the non-reflective <br /> metal roofs. <br /> Brief discussion followed regarding using bricks on the proposed patios. <br /> Gene Finch spoke in support of the project. <br /> Alok Damireddy spoke in support of the project and requested the setback of the building near his <br /> residence to be five feet instead of four feet in order to preserve his privacy. He expressed concerns <br /> regarding obstruction of his views and suggested removing the windows on the north side of Building 3. <br /> Tom Gallagher commended the Planning Commission for their work on this project as well as City staff. <br /> He opined the project will enhance the extension of downtown and commented on the possibility of a <br /> new Civic Center, in the future. He felt that retail uses will not create too much traffic and spoke in <br /> support of the project. <br /> Discussion followed regarding the inclusion of landscaping to mitigate privacy issues. It was noted that <br /> the minimum setback on the north side is five feet and goes up to eight feet. Ensuing discussion <br /> pertained to the number of windows on the north side of Building 3. <br /> Mike Carey explained his preference for Option 2 in terms of landscaping and parking and agreed with <br /> adjusting the curb cut as suggested by Council. <br /> Mr. Weinstein noted everything possible will be done to ensure the viability of the oak trees. <br /> Mayor Thorne closed the public hearing. <br /> Councilmember Narum spoke positively regarding the increased vitality of downtown and spoke in <br /> support of keeping the project design, flexible. She commented on doing as much as is possible to <br /> save two existing oak trees and supported Option 2. She suggested moving the south curb cut three <br /> feet, away from the tree. <br /> Councilmember Olson noted this is a gateway project for downtown and spoke positively regarding the <br /> project. <br /> Councilmember Brown spoke in support of the project. <br /> Councilmember Pentin spoke positively regarding the project and the architecture suggested future <br /> discussions relative to story poles. <br /> Mayor Thorne commented on upcoming downtown projects and spoke in support of the project. <br /> MOTION: It was m/s by Narum/Pentin introduce Ordinance No. 2150 approving application for a <br /> certificate of appropriateness and planned unit development rezoning and development plan approval <br /> as filed under case PUD-118, waived full reading and adopted Resolution No. 16-884 approving a <br /> Growth Management agreement and accepted staff recommendations, including the changes in the <br /> conditions of approval, accepted Option 2 with the seventh parking spot on Bernal, blocked with pavers, <br /> with enhanced landscaping and moving the south curb cut three feet away from the tree. Motion <br /> passed by the following vote: <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 5 September 6,2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.