Laserfiche WebLink
ordinance, they're not detrimental to the health and safety of the neighbors, why are you <br />limiting it only to 16 days? <br />Weinstein: I think we recognize that even though noise is not being generated in <br />exceedance of the noise ordinance because human voices don't count in regard to the <br />noise ordinance, we're still acknowledging that noise is an issue for neighbors just like <br />activity levels are, just like lighting is, just like traffic is, just like parking is, so these <br />restrictions aren't just focused on noise. They're focused on overall activity levels. We <br />understand that neighbors are impacted by activity and that includes all of the things I <br />just mentioned. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So these activities are detrimental to the health, safety and <br />welfare. <br />Weinstein: I don't think they would rise to that level. The findings that we're <br />recommending indicate that we think that with these restrictions, the use will not be <br />detrimental to the public health, safety and welfare, but there's the potential for that to <br />occur, right? And that's the whole impetus behind conditions that we're suggesting. So <br />we think that with these conditions there won't be an adverse impact on health and <br />safety and public welfare, but without these conditions there could be. <br />Beaudin: Could I just add to that? So I've seen these types of circumstances in <br />different cities over time where you have residential uses next to commercial or <br />non - residential uses, and I think it's about finding the balance. The reason this is back <br />before you from a staff perspective, the Masons got a little out of hand in 2008/2009. <br />That was reigned in, and frankly the only reason this is back is because we received <br />repeated complaints from a neighboring property. So what we're trying to do is find a <br />middle ground. I would suggest that the public health, safety and welfare of the <br />community isn't threatened by the current use permit, but it's clearly causing some <br />discomfort for the neighbor and so we're trying to address that matter. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So Jenny, do you know when the rear yard was landscaped <br />and began use? I mean, do we have a permit for that? <br />Commissioner Balch: When the door got put in. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: The door was installed in 2008, but was there a permit for the <br />rear yard improvements? If not, I don't believe so. Do you know when that took place? <br />Was it shortly after the doors were installed? <br />Soo: I think perhaps it is around that time because otherwise I couldn't think why there <br />is any need for the doors. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: That also seems to correlate with the timeframe that you said <br />the Masons got a bit out of control; the same time as the yard went in. <br />Beaudin: Again, it was the scale of the events. We have conditions to modify and <br />regulate the physical improvements to the building. We actually saw a serious or <br />significant increase in the overall number of people attending events and the kinds of <br />EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 5 of 52 <br />