My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 6
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
06 ATTACHMENT 6
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 11:37:54 AM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:50:35 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Nagler: And I don't mean to make too fine a point of this, but Julie, you <br />apparently are saying that it is sort of defined by activity; that you know what you know <br />when you see it as opposed to its defined by the license you hold, right? <br />Harryman: I think that's a fair statement, yes, thinking about what the conditional uses <br />are that are allowed in this RM multi - residential district, that these types of uses, which <br />are based on activities, are okay, and religious institutions. The Masons are known for <br />not just doing that, they do a little bit more. For example, daycares are quite common on <br />church sites. <br />Commissioner Nagler: So whether they remain qualified as a non - profit or not isn't <br />relevant because it doesn't define the activity nor defines the uses to which the building <br />is being put, right? <br />Harryman: I think that's generally true and a fair statement, but if so much time passed <br />and they are really not the Masons or really not a church, and they are just calling <br />themselves that, but they are actually a nightclub or some other type of use.... <br />Commissioner Nagler: Okay. Jenny, in the staff recommendation on the number of <br />hours, you are suggesting the use permit should allow for outdoor activities during the <br />summer months, as I understand it, the recommendation is that it be allowed basically <br />both days every weekend, right? Up to eight days a month. <br />Soo: Eight weekends <br />Commissioner Nagler: Oh, eight weekends during the period. <br />Soo: Its eight weekends in nine months. <br />Weinstein: It's two weekends from March to May, a maximum of four weekends from <br />June to August and a maximum of two weeks from September to October, so it's a total <br />of eight weekends combined over the course of the year. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Thank you. I just read that to be per month. <br />Commissioner Allen: I thought it was per month too, so thank you. <br />Commissioner Nagler: Thank you very much. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: It does say in one of the conditions that the City can approve <br />additional uses and times, correct? <br />Soo: Yes, we have a condition that we could approve, but it depends what it is and it is <br />up to discretion of the Director of Community Development and we could bring that <br />request including activities and hours back to the Planning Commission for review. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: Let me back up to the eight weekends in a nine month <br />period. That's 16 days. If the City feels that these parties are not in violation of the noise <br />EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 4 of 52 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.