06 ATTACHMENT 6 - Laserfiche WebLink

that's within your purview. You're looking for site design criteria in addition to the uses associated. Commissioner O'Connor: I don't mean just for the Masons. Beaudin: I believe that on residential property, we do have a maximum number of accessory structures as well, so we'd want to look into all of that and we will. Commissioner Balch: So I apologize because I know we're on the question part. Real quick on the conditions that staff has proposed, I believe it would be basically, to the Director of Community Development's point, condition 20 or right above 21 on page 3, whether other buildings are ancillary structures, but further on condition 34, 35, 36, these are the noise /music items that staff has proposed. I'm just confirming that no music shall be allowed outside the building means no music of any type, amplified or not and that the live or pre- recorded music; by the nature pre- recorded amplified, is that purposely not included in that condition? It is probably implied given it was pre- recorded. I ask so we can consider it as we move further. And lastly, a timer shall be installed on the exterior light on the north side of the building; condition 39. That's great. What are the times of the timer so we can work through that? Those are my questions but more discussion points. Chair Ritter: I just have one question. Jenny, when you put these conditions together in option 3, did the Millers or the Masons or residents of the Masons look at them and give you feedback on them as whether they are in favor or not in favor or 50/50? Soo: Some of the conditions included are actually addressed at Miller's concern such as the door, to have an STC rated door, to have the lights to the shield and the window covering to be added. These are actually fully addressed issues brought by the Millers. Commissioner Nagler: But to be fair, they strongly object to the permitted days to allow that use? Okay. Chair Ritter: Partially. I'm sure we'll hear about this. Okay, so are we okay with questions? Thank you. So as you can see, we have a lot of cards here. What I would ask is that you come through and talk about not the history but what we need to do going forward because that's what we really have to make a decision on and we've read a lot about the history and there's a lot of history. Not good history, interesting history, but if you can, give us your feedback because we really want to listen to you of what we think we need to do to help get this moving forward, whether it be six -weeks or six- months, we're not sure. And, because there's no applicant, what we're going to do is everybody gets three minutes. I'll be lenient on it for some of you because I know people want to say a little more, but we're going to try and keep it to three minutes and just pick out your bullets and give them to us because we really want your opinion, so. Raise of hands, how many Masons are here? Okay, the rest I'm assuming are residents. Okay, I'll just start here, Michael Miller please. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS OPENED. EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, June 22, 2016 Page 11 of 52