My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06 ATTACHMENT 5
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
06 ATTACHMENT 5
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:07:49 PM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:40:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
215
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Additionally, staff received letters and emails from Michael and Darlene Miller, residents <br />at 5903 Bryce Canyon Court, which addressed their concerns regarding the Masons' <br />operation. <br />CONCLUSION <br />The original use permit allowed the operation of a Lodge without significant restrictions <br />or limitations. The Millers believe that the improvements to the building and the site <br />(i.e., the installation of the patio, lawn, and door on the north side) and the recent <br />activities at the facilities are violations of the Lodge's original approval. Staff concludes <br />that while the improvements and activities may not technically violate the Permit, the <br />current operation of the facility is not acceptable. <br />The Planning Commission has the following options: <br />Option No. 1 -- Revocation of UP- 77 -13. <br />Selecting this option means that the Planning Commission finds that the operation of <br />the Lodge is detrimental to the public welfare and is injurious to properties in the vicinity <br />based on the noise complaints. Under the Pleasanton Municipal Code, revocation of a <br />use permit may occur when the original findings to support the operation can no longer <br />be made. This option would require the Masons to cease all operations within a specific <br />time period, unless appealed to the City Council. <br />Staff does not support this revocation option. As the Millers have pointed out, there was <br />not any problem with the Masons until just a few years ago. Staff believes that these <br />noise issues can be adequately addressed with new conditions regarding operations <br />added to the use permit. <br />Option No. 2 -- Revision of Conditions of Approval <br />Selecting this option recognizes that the Lodge could be operated in a manner <br />respectful to the residential neighborhood; however, additional restrictions and <br />clarifications are needed so that there would be no misunderstanding in the future as to <br />what uses /activities are allowed or not allowed at the Lodge. The option allows for <br />additional conditions to be added to address issues that have been raised for <br />discussion. <br />Staff supports this approach and has provided a revised set of Conditions of Approval <br />as Exhibit A. <br />UP- 77 -13, Pleasanton Masonic Lodge Planning Commission <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.