Laserfiche WebLink
2. Should the double -door on the north side of the building be removed? <br />From the Millers' complaints and the calls received by the Police Department, it is <br />clear that activities at the Lodge have caused disturbances, mostly noise - related, to <br />the adjoining residents. <br />One option is to modify the door. Having a solid door may reduce the noise level. <br />The Masons may consult a sound attenuation professional to find out mitigation <br />measure so the noise generated at the Lodge would not exceed the limits stated in <br />the Noise Ordinance. The consultant's recommendations would be reviewed by the <br />Director of Community Development, who would then determine whether or not the <br />recommendations are acceptable and /or if the door needs to be modified or <br />relocated. The door cannot be eliminated entirely as it is required for emergency <br />exiting. <br />3. Should the use of the outdoor area, specifically the patio area in the back, be <br />prohibited or restricted? <br />The Millers requested that noise be contained within the Lodge building and that the <br />north side of the Lodge site not to be used for any activity. <br />Staff believes that prohibiting the use of the rear yard area at the Lodge may be <br />extreme. When the Lodge was rented for company functions, lunches were served <br />in the outdoor area without causing disturbance to the residential neighbors. If the <br />usage of the outdoor area is limited to a certain number of people or restricted to <br />certain hours (similar restriction has been placed on the event centers in Ruby Hill), <br />it could alleviate noise impact to adjoining residents. Alternately, additional noise <br />mitigation, such as the installation of noise walls could be required. <br />PUBLIC NOTICE <br />Notice of this application was sent to all property owners and occupants within <br />1,000 feet of the subject property. <br />Staff has received calls from the residents in the neighborhood inquiring about the <br />notice. The majority of them stated that the Masons have been respectful to the <br />residential neighbors since the Conditional Use Permit approval. However, some of the <br />neighbors felt that the activities held in the last 12 months have gone out-of -hand, which <br />prompted them to call the Pleasanton Police for enforcement. <br />Emails from the residents inquiring about the hearing notice are attached (Exhibit I). <br />Staff has discussed the subject matter with Ms. Connie Cox, president of Valley Trails <br />Homeowners Association (HOA). <br />UP- 77 -13, Pleasanton Masonic Lodge Planning Commission <br />8 <br />