Laserfiche WebLink
1. The height of a structure, as defined by the PMC, is measured from the average elevation of the natural grade <br />of the ground covered by the structure to the mean height between eaves and ridges for a hip, gable, or <br />gambrel roof. <br />2. The height of an accessory structure, as defined by the PMC, is measured from finished grade to the highest <br />point. <br />3. Measured from finished grade to the highest point of the roof's ridge. <br />4. Measured from the closest building wall to the property line. <br />5. Measured from the optional covered patio, noted as the "CA Room" in Exhibit B. <br />6. Private open space in the RM district can be used to meet the group open space requirements, per the PMC. <br />Front Yard Setbacks in the Area <br />Upon returning to the Commission for a formal recommendation, Commissioner Allen requested <br />that information be provided on other front yard setbacks of PUD projects in the vicinity. <br />• The existing townhomes on the north side of St. John Street have a front yard setback of <br />25 feet. <br />• Kimberly Commons, located east of the subject site, has front yard setbacks of 11 feet, <br />6 inches for the detached single - family homes that face Peters Avenue and 6 -foot, 6 -inch <br />front yard setbacks for the multi - family units that face St. John Street. <br />• The single - family homes constructed on the northwest corner of Peters Avenue and <br />W. Angela Street has 7- to 8 -foot front yard setbacks. <br />• The recently approved development on the northeast corner of Peters Avenue and St. Mary <br />Street has 20 -foot front yard setbacks on the first -floor and 15 -foot front yard setbacks on the <br />second -and third - floors. <br />As proposed, the townhomes with frontage on St. John Street have a 10 -foot setback, <br />measured from the building wall to the property line, which is similar to those setbacks at <br />Kimberly Commons and the single - family homes on the northwest corner of Peters Avenue and <br />W. Angela Street. <br />The Commission was generally supportive of the proposed development standards at the Work <br />Session. There was discussion regarding the front yard setback for the units on St. John Street <br />and varying opinions about a 10 -foot setback. However, the Commission agreed that the <br />height, number of stories (two), and non - continuous building walls could warrant flexibility to the <br />development standards through a PUD application. <br />Historic Home <br />Since the Work Session, the applicant has revised the plans in order to retain and relocate the <br />historic home on -site. The plan revisions did not significantly alter the previously proposed <br />setbacks for the townhomes. However, this is the first opportunity the Commission will have to <br />review the proposed setbacks for the retained and relocated historic home and proposed <br />detached garage. Staff is supportive of the proposed setbacks for the existing home given the <br />site constraints and due to the fact that the setbacks are greater than the setbacks for the <br />townhomes. However, staff initially recommended that the detached garage be moved farther <br />north on the site and that the tandem space be relocated to the south of the detached garage to <br />ensure usability of the tandem space. In doing this, the garage would be located within 2 feet of <br />the home. Staff has added a condition of approval to reflect that the garage and tandem space <br />should be relocated. <br />P16 -1201, PUD -120, & TRACT 8326 Planning Commission <br />6 of 32 <br />