My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
07
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
092016
>
07
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:08:00 PM
Creation date
9/15/2016 3:24:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/20/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
07
Document Relationships
07 ATTACHMENT 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\092016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
160
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to truck it. So there would be a little bit of a compromise between the Fire Department <br />access and one guest space, but if you were to add any more guest space, it would <br />eliminate a unit. One guest space takes up 9 feet, or 9x19, but unless we push the <br />houses further back towards the back, they will be more private driveways than a <br />parking spot for any random guests. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: So I couldn't tell how much space is in between those rear <br />units where it's a little bit wider in the front? Is it large enough to hold a car? <br />Lee: No, and in between the units, the front doors are kind of....if you see the little black <br />dots on the side of each of those duplexes...that's a walkway and there's a little porch <br />area. So between the porch and the buildings, there's probably about an 8 -foot <br />separation so there wouldn't be enough room for a car there. <br />Commissioner O'Connor: And on the two outside ends what would be I guess a fence <br />line? <br />Lee: Right. We would either have to eliminate the porch on the houses and still really <br />study if you put a parking space and you have to open your door once you do park <br />there, it is pretty tight. What they originally had was a large six -plex building, but the <br />massing and scale of that building was not consistent with the surrounding <br />neighborhood so we divided those into 3 smaller duplex units. I think the scale of the <br />buildings will be more receptive to the surrounding neighborhoods, whether they have <br />two stories versus three stories. So we were really trying to meet the character of the <br />neighborhoods rather than making one or two big buildings. You know, then we can <br />maybe have parking but the scale would be different from what we see here. <br />O'Connor: Do you know how many curb cuts are in the front of these three lots? How <br />many curb cuts are there today? Because now it only looks like you need one. So are <br />we filling in two other curb cuts that would have been for driveways for the other two <br />lots? <br />Lee: Right now I know the existing home had a driveway with two lots on both sides. <br />Amos: There are two curb cuts along the project frontage. <br />Commissioner Nagler: So we're eliminating one. <br />Lee: Yes, we're eliminating one. <br />Amos: There's 3 lots currently, so that's why. They have a curb cut along where there's <br />a garage in the back through here. They have a curb cut here and they have another <br />curb cut through here for this vacant parcel here. <br />O'Connor: So there are three today and we only need one, so we're actually filling in <br />two? <br />EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, March 23, 2016 Page 3 of 18 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.