My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
WORKSHOP REPORT
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
091316
>
WORKSHOP REPORT
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/9/2016 1:08:25 PM
Creation date
9/8/2016 3:13:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/13/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
Document Relationships
WORKSHOP ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\091316
WORKSHOP AGENDA
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\091316
WORKSHOP ATTACHMENT 1 AND 2
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\091316
WORKSHOP ATTACHMENT 4
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\091316
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Priority Projects Chapter <br /> One of the key elements of the Update is to establish a prioritized list of projects to be <br /> completed over the next five years. As mentioned previously, the Update has <br /> established the goal of providing complete "low stress" corridors. As a result, the <br /> projects, although scored individually using the priority scoring matrix, are grouped by <br /> corridor, and the combined and averaged score was used to establish the project <br /> rankings. <br /> Priority Matrix <br /> The Priority Scoring Matrix is detailed in Attachment 2 and ranks each project based on <br /> its benefit. Each project is then grouped by corridor and the average score for the <br /> corridor is used to produce the priority ranking shown below. The Criteria used to score <br /> the projects include: Connectivity (4 points), Demand (3 points), Feasibility (3 points), <br /> Safety (4 points) and Safe Route to School (3 points). A detailed breakdown of points <br /> given to each project is shown in the attached spreadsheet. <br /> Priority Ranking <br /> The scoring provided the following prioritization by corridor (detailed maps of each <br /> corridor are provided in Appendix A). <br /> Rank Corridor <br /> 1. West Las Positas Boulevard <br /> 2. Santa Rita Road <br /> 3. Foothill Road Feasibility Study <br /> 4. 1-580 and 1-680 Overcrossing Improvements <br /> 5. Stanley Boulevard <br /> 6. Valley Avenue Alternatives <br /> 7. Bernal Avenue <br /> 8. Centennial Trail to Iron Horse Trail via BART <br /> 9. East Dublin/Pleasanton BART to Downtown <br /> 10. Stoneridge Drive <br /> 11. Arroyo de la Laguna and Iron Horse Trail Feasibility Study <br /> 12. Downtown Access <br /> 13. Arroyo Mocho Trail to Downtown (Bicycle Boulevards) <br /> 14. Sunol Boulevard <br /> 15. East Side (Bicycle Boulevards) <br /> 16. West Dublin/Pleasanton BART to Downtown <br /> Approach/Methodology for Funding Corridors AND Individual Projects <br /> The Steering Committee has discussed the need to prioritize the Corridors AND to have <br /> the ability to select projects to be improved that are not on the highest priority corridor <br /> (to ensure that the City can continue to make improvements in other parts of the <br /> community). <br /> One way to create this kind of flexibility is to add a secondary "by project" ranking that <br /> can be used to identify high priority projects that might not be included in the highest <br /> Page 12 of 16 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.