My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
090616
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:49:21 PM
Creation date
8/31/2016 3:01:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
13
Document Relationships
13 ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\090616
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
RECOMMENDATION <br /> 1. Make the PUD findings for the proposed development plan as stated in the July 13, 2016, <br /> Planning Commission staff report (pages 22-25 in Attachment 4); <br /> 2. Introduce the draft ordinance approving Case PUD-118, Certificate of Appropriateness <br /> and PUD Rezoning and Development Plan, subject to the conditions of approval, Exhibit <br /> A (Attachment 1); <br /> 3. Adopt a resolution approving the Growth Management Agreement (Attachment 2) for six <br /> growth management unit allocations (P16-0203) for the project; and <br /> 4. Find that the proposed project was adequately analyzed in the certified Environmental <br /> Impact Report (ER) for the Downtown Specific Plan and no further environmental review <br /> is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). <br /> FINANCIAL STATEMENT <br /> The project would be expected to generate revenues to cover its costs of service. Increases <br /> in property and sales taxes would be used to provide services, such as police and fire <br /> services for the increased demand generated by the homes and office/retail space. The <br /> applicant will be required to pay development impact fees that will be used to offset the cost <br /> of City facilities and infrastructure necessitated by the development. <br /> BACKGROUND <br /> On January 21, 2016, the applicant submitted applications for a certificate of appropriateness <br /> to demolish all on-site structures and a PUD Rezoning and Development Plan application to <br /> construct one, three-story mixed-use building with approximately 952 square feet of <br /> office/retail space on the first-floor and three apartments on the remaining second and third <br /> floors, and three, three-story detached single-family homes on the subject site. Staff was <br /> concerned that the initial proposal lacked consistency with the site's Downtown Specific Plan <br /> Office land use designation because it contained a small amount of ground floor office space <br /> and was primarily residential in nature. The project was reviewed and discussed at a Work <br /> Session with the Planning Commission held on May 25, 2016. The Commission supported <br /> the project, but indicated that the design should be modified to better conform to the intent of <br /> the Downtown Specific Plan. Suggested modifications included modifying the project to add <br /> additional ground-floor commercial space in the residential building proposed in the <br /> southwest corner of the site (Residence 1), and re-designing this ground-floor space to look <br /> more like a commercial space (e.g., large storefront windows and a separate entrance <br /> allowing access into the commercial space). The Planning Commission indicated that these <br /> changes would bring the proposed project further into compliance with the Downtown <br /> Specific Plan. The Commissioners also provided direction on the project's parking and <br /> design as detailed in the Work Session section of the attached Planning Commission staff <br /> report (pages 2-4 of Attachment 4). <br /> On June 28, 2016, the applicant submitted revised plans that incorporated office space <br /> (ranging from 180-194 square feet in area) on the first floors of the three detached single- <br /> family homes and modified the south elevation of Residence 1 in order to create a stronger <br /> office/retail presence along Old Bernal Avenue. After publication of the Planning Commission <br /> Page 2 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.