Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT 6 <br /> PUD-118, Mike Carey <br /> Applications for: (1) certificate of appropriateness to demolish all existing <br /> structures; (2) rezoning of an approximately 13,040-square-foot site from <br /> 0 (Office) to PUD-MU (Planned Unit Development — Mixed Use); and (3) PUD <br /> Development Plan approval to construct: (a) an approximately 2,229-square-foot <br /> three-story mixed-use building with office/retail space on the first-floor and three <br /> apartments on the second- and third-floors; and (b) three, three-story detached <br /> single-family homes with potential office space on the first-floors and related site <br /> improvements at the property located at 4791 Augustine Street. <br /> Natalie Amos presented the staff report and described the scope, layout, and key <br /> elements of the proposal. <br /> Commissioner Allen: Natalie you said that the guidelines don't specify metal, but I want <br /> to be really true to the guidelines and I'm looking at page 36 of the Downtown Design <br /> Guidelines that were updated right after the historic guidelines were done two years ago <br /> and it actually precludes metal specifically. It says, "Use natural exterior materials. Fake <br /> stone, rough-hewn wood or plywood, metal, or plastic should not be used as exterior <br /> siding." Then further on another point it says, and I realize this second point is a little <br /> grey, but the first one on siding to me is black and white. The next one says, "Metal <br /> roofs are discouraged; however, metal shingles that resemble shake or tile with a dull <br /> finish and muted color may be approved." <br /> Furthermore what I did is look at the Council meeting that was used to approve this and <br /> I found that metal was brought up to the Council and the 4-1 vote was we do not want it <br /> and there were a set of decisions and then that drove these guidelines. Relative to <br /> historic standards and I didn't know this at the workshop; this level of discussion <br /> because all we discussed was those two little houses and whether they were historic, <br /> but I had no idea that this was a potential issue. So, you know, I'm a little concerned <br /> about the use of metal because I think if you start using it and it sounds like it wasn't <br /> intended to be used, as we know, it's a precedent for other homes and we could end up <br /> with a lot of homes that have this. So I wanted to just ask you, when you said it wasn't <br /> mentioned, on the siding it was specifically excluded. <br /> Amos: Yes, for siding it is listed, but the applicant is using it in small portions of the <br /> architecture for that part of it. They do have it in some elements. It could be open and <br /> the Planning Commission could decide that we could remove the metal if that is part of <br /> the conversation the Planning Commission wants to have. <br /> Commissioner Allen: And on the roofing are we using as they say these small metal <br /> shingles that resemble shakes or tiles, or it looked like we were using more of the long <br /> sheets. <br /> Amos: Correct; it's shown in the color material plan sheet but it is a longer version of it. <br /> Commissioner Allen: So it appears we're not being consistent with this. <br /> Chair Ritter: You said other residents downtown use the same type of roofing? Or <br /> sheet metal? <br /> EXCERPT: DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, July 13, 2016 Page 1 of 21 <br />