My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
090616
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:49:21 PM
Creation date
8/31/2016 3:01:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
13
Document Relationships
13 ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\090616
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mike Carey January 26,2016 <br /> Historic Resource Evaluation: 4791 Augustine St., Pleasanton,CA Page 8 <br /> C. That embody the distinctive characteristics of a type,period, or method of construction, or that <br /> represent the work of a master, or that possess high artistic values, or that represent a <br /> significant and distinguishable entity whose components may lack individual distinction; or <br /> The subject residence is a highly altered, Vernacular building that has suffered from additions to all <br /> primary elevations. Because of the full-width front porch addition, the poorly constructed rear <br /> addition, and the right side addition, the subject residence is no longer a distinctive type, period, or <br /> method of construction, as a Vernacular Queen Anne-style residence and has lost substantial <br /> historic integrity. The architect for the building is not known; however, the building clearly is not <br /> the work of a master architect. For these reasons, the building is not eligible under this Criterion. <br /> D. That have yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. <br /> The property does not contain any archaeological sites, or other site characteristics that would <br /> potentially yield information important to prehistory or history. <br /> California Register of Historical Resources Evaluation: <br /> The California Register Criteria appear below, with an evaluation of the subject property: <br /> 1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of <br /> California's history and cultural heritage. <br /> The subject property is not eligible under this criterion because it is not associated with any events <br /> that have made a significant contribution to State of California, or City of Pleasanton history. <br /> While the subject building was constructed during the City of Pleasanton's post-railroad expansion, <br /> this event is not significant enough to qualify the subject property under Criterion 1. <br /> 2. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. <br /> The subject property contained a continuously changing list of occupants, none of whom owned or <br /> lived in the residence for more than one year. The exception is the Zaro family, who owned the <br /> property from 1926 to 1997. The Zaro family owned and operated the Americo Zaro Gravel <br /> Company. However, none of Zaro family or descendants have proven to be significant in State of <br /> California, or City of Pleasanton history. The property is not eligible under this Criterion. <br /> 3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type,period, region, or method of construction, or <br /> represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values. <br /> The subject residence is a highly altered, Vernacular building that has suffered from additions to all <br /> primary elevations. Because of the full-width front porch addition, the poorly constructed rear <br /> addition, and the right side addition, the subject residence is no longer a distinctive type, period, or <br /> method of construction, as a Vernacular Queen Anne-style residence and has lost substantial <br /> historic integrity. The architect for the building is not known; however, the building clearly is not <br /> the work of a master architect. For these reasons, the building is not eligible under this Criterion. <br /> 4. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. <br /> The property does not contain any archaeological sites, or other site characteristics that would <br /> potentially yield information important to prehistory or history. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.