My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
13
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
090616
>
13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:49:21 PM
Creation date
8/31/2016 3:01:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
9/6/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
13
Document Relationships
13 ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\090616
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
163
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to park their vehicles in the garages. A condition of approval requires that these parking <br /> restrictions be recorded as restrictive covenants that will "run with the land" and therefore <br /> would be binding on all future property owners. <br /> Mixed-Use Building <br /> A mixed-use building in the Central-Commercial (C-C) and Core Area Overlay District where <br /> commercial or office uses are mixed with apartments, one bedroom or studio units may <br /> provide one parking space per dwelling unit (PMC Section 18.80.070.E). The applicant is <br /> proposing PUD-MU zoning and staff is recommending that C-C District uses apply to the <br /> proposed mixed-use building and office/retail space in Residence 1. Therefore, staff looked <br /> at Section 18.80.070.E for guidance in identifying the appropriate parking requirements for <br /> the project. <br /> If Section 18.80.070.E were applied to the project, a total of six parking spaces would be <br /> required: one parking space per studio unit and three parking spaces for the ground-level <br /> office/retail space in the MU building. The applicant is proposing a building that has <br /> commercial/office uses mixed with studio apartments. Therefore, staff believes that the <br /> mixed-use building meets the intent of Section 18.80.070.E. because six spaces would be <br /> provided for the building's occupants. <br /> The Planning Commission recommended moving the existing curb cut on Augustine Street in <br /> order to provide one additional parking space for the office/retail space in Residence 1, <br /> bringing the on-site parking supply to seven spaces for all on-site office/retail spaces and <br /> studio apartments. Moving the existing curb cut would also increase the chances of survival <br /> of the northern-most heritage tree (see the Preferred Tree Protection Design section of this <br /> report). Relocating the curb cut would also make it easier to enter/exit the parking spaces in <br /> the proposed lot. The applicant would like to retain the curb cut in its existing location and <br /> modified the plans to include the additional parking space on the south side of Residence 1. <br /> Staff believes that, as proposed, the additional parking on the south side of Residence 1 <br /> would detract from the pedestrian-friendly appearance of the mixed-use frontage on Old <br /> Bernal Avenue. Furthermore, it would be difficult to pull into/out of the standalone space. <br /> Staff's recommendation is to landscape the area where the additional parking space is <br /> proposed and relocate the curb cut on Augustine Street to accommodate the additional <br /> parking space. Staff has added a condition of approval to reflect this requirement. <br /> Guest Parking <br /> Detached, single-family homes are not required to provide guest parking. Guest parking for <br /> apartments is required at a ratio of one parking space per seven units. Since there are only <br /> three apartment units, the PMC does not require on-site guest parking. Therefore, guests <br /> would utilize on-street parking. <br /> Tree Removal <br /> The applicant is proposing to remove one of the three heritage-sized trees on-site to <br /> accommodate the proposed development. The City's Landscape Architect, Matt Gruber, <br /> reviewed the tree report for the proposed development and conducted a site visit to the <br /> subject property to confirm the information in the tree report. Mr. Gruber agrees with the <br /> estimated value of the trees, the health observations, and other conclusions regarding the on- <br /> Page 10 of 14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.