My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
03
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
081616
>
03
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 10:45:33 AM
Creation date
8/10/2016 2:27:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
8/16/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
03
Document Relationships
03 EXHIBIT B
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\081616
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
98
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Another direction we had from staff was, we don't want to back up to Dublin Canyon <br /> Road but also we want those homes as far away from Dublin Canyon Road as possible <br /> very similar to Ms. Young's house, very similar to the Lesters, very similar to the all the <br /> other homes, they are not right on Dublin Canyon Road. And so yes, even though we <br /> wanted to cover the garage and that portion, I think that there would be light and activity <br /> on all the other lots, particularly the two middle lots (3 and 4). And yet it's very <br /> appropriate with the Craftsmen style, one-story home that's not going to be a <br /> "McMansion" in the middle of these other country type of homes. So there will be some <br /> light and activity and kind of the consensus is that just the fact that there's something <br /> there will have people caution a little bit as they are speeding down that road. Of <br /> course, if we put in those flashers and other things that may be effective, that could help <br /> as well. <br /> So keeping the country feel is important and when you look at other parts of the City, we <br /> kind of compare this mostly to south of Bernal on Foothill Road and you don't see <br /> sidewalks down there and actually in some of them, some of the small communities, <br /> they only have sidewalks in their streets. When you go into Oak Tree Farm, Dorothea, <br /> there's a couple of them down there but they don't even have sidewalks inside the <br /> street to keep that country feel. <br /> The second thing bring that I wanted to g up and this is a very small thing, is in our <br /> internal street, staff wants to have concrete sidewalks and we don't want that. We'd <br /> rather have the DG, the decomposed granite. It helps us with our impervious for the soil <br /> and we think that would be a better look for a small community that's trying to strive to <br /> be country instead of having white gleaming sidewalks. So that was a small thing, but <br /> nonetheless, we think it's important. And if the Planning Commission would so direct, <br /> we would love to get rid of that sidewalk internally as well. That would be more area for <br /> landscaping. That would be better to turn for vehicles, emergency vehicles or for <br /> residents, so you don't have to have those sidewalks especially if you're in a 5-lot <br /> development in a country area. <br /> Nagler: Another question—as you know, when the City approves zoning changes and a <br /> PUD and densities are higher than were previously allowed, a public amenity is <br /> required. As I understand it, you have not yet proposed a public amenity as part of this <br /> zoning change request. Do you have ideas about that or you don't think it's appropriate <br /> for the project?What are your thoughts? <br /> Houston: I think it's very appropriate and so I think that's part of this discussion. The one <br /> thing I think is a benefit to everybody is undergrounding these power lines. We don't <br /> have to do that but we think it's better for the residents of that small court which we're <br /> calling Walter Court, and we think that's better for all residents in the area and for the <br /> people of Pleasanton. It's not a small number to do that, especially for that land. But up <br /> and above that, it is only 5 lots and so we would look forward to working with either the <br /> City Manager or whoever that may be as to what an appropriate contribution might be, <br /> but trying to get credit for some of the amenities that we are putting out there, the <br /> pedestrian flashers as we proposed, and again, this is to be fair to staff, that's not <br /> something that they have heard of yet. It's just that the neighbors in the last week and a <br /> half have been excited about that because traffic is an issue. So, we're obviously open <br /> EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, January 13, 2016 Page 8 of 22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.