My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
16
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
071916
>
16
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:52:24 PM
Creation date
7/13/2016 9:16:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
7/19/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
16
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
increase parking supply. A draft Parking Strategy has been provided to the City <br />Council for review in advance of seeking input from key groups such as the <br />Pleasanton Downtown Association, Economic Vitality Committee, and the <br />Planning Commission before returning to City Council for adoption. <br />In addition to the documents listed above, the City is also undertaking a Bicycle and <br />Pedestrian Master Plan Update, which will ultimately enhance bike and pedestrian <br />access City -wide, including Downtown. The City is also working on implementing the <br />Lions Wayside and Delucchi Park Master Plan, which redesigns two existing parks that <br />function as an important community gathering space at the eastern edge of the <br />Downtown commercial district. <br />The DSP has provided solid policy guidance for development in Downtown over the last <br />14 years, as evidenced by recent context- sensitive infill projects that have filled -in key <br />gaps in the commercial core, the presence of an inviting pedestrian environment along <br />Main Street and adjacent east/west side streets, the continued protection of historic <br />commercial and residential buildings, and a vibrant retail environment. However, <br />experience with implementation of the DSP and feedback from community members and <br />elected /appointed officials has indicated a potential need for reevaluating certain <br />elements of the plan to: <br />• clarify areas of policy direction that are vague, <br />• more effectively respond to market factors and community objectives, <br />• strengthen the protection of the physical features of Downtown that are valued by <br />the community, and <br />• incorporate key concepts and principles from recent long -term planning efforts. <br />Initially, DSP topics that were targeted for an update or clarification included: integration <br />of residential development, public parking, and the Office land use district. After <br />receiving informal feedback from the community, this list expanded to include potential <br />topics for consideration such as: parking requirements for development projects; second <br />units (or accessory dwelling units); maximum building height in Downtown for residential <br />and commercial properties; clarification of maximum building height for residential and <br />commercial properties; trail /pathway integration; Division Street enhancements; <br />integration of recent long -term planning efforts (e.g., Civic Center Master Plan); and <br />green design features. <br />The potential expansion of the scope of work for the DSP Update, and the confluence of <br />other long -term planning efforts that affect Downtown, suggested the need for a more <br />comprehensive planning effort than originally anticipated, including a more in -depth <br />public involvement effort, the possible formation of a Technical Advisory Committee or <br />Task Force, and the need for consultant assistance. <br />DISCUSSION <br />The key objective for the DSP update is to complete a comprehensive update of the plan <br />to better reflect community priorities. Another objective will be to consolidate the policy <br />Page 3of5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.