My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
062116
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/15/2016 1:56:58 PM
Creation date
6/15/2016 10:10:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
6/21/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City of Pleasanton Legislative Platform 2016 <br /> e 0 0 <br /> THE CITY OF <br /> PLEASANTONO <br /> June 8,2016 <br /> Honorable Assembly Member Aetna Nazarian <br /> Chair,Assembly Budget Subcommittee#4 <br /> State Capitol,Room 6026 <br /> Sacramento,CA 95814 <br /> Sent via Fax:916-319-2199 <br /> Honorable Senator Richard Roth <br /> Chair,Senate Budget Subcommittee#4 <br /> State Capitol,Room 5019 <br /> Sacramento,CA 95814 <br /> Sent via Fax:916-323-8386 <br /> RE: Governor's By Right Homing Proposal <br /> Notice of Opposition <br /> Dear Honorable Chairs Namrian and Roth: <br /> The City of Pleasanton opposes the recently released proposal by the Governor to pre-empt local <br /> discretionary land use approvals of specified housing developments by having all such approvals be <br /> considered "ministerial" actions, meaning eliminating opportunities for public review, project-level <br /> environmental review and restricting design review. <br /> We believe that such fundamental policy changes should not be rushed through as a budget proposal,but <br /> merit extensive review by the appropriate policy committees in a deliberative fashion. <br /> Eliminating opportunities for public review of these major development projects goes against the principles <br /> of local democracy and public engagement. While it may be frustrating for some developers to hear <br /> concerns about traffic,parking and other development impacts,those affected by such projects have a right <br /> to be heard. Not having such outlets will increase public distrust in government <br /> Avoiding or restricting design review is also short-sighted. Community acceptance can be improved <br /> through good design that ambles a new structure to match the thoughtful and carefully planned character. <br /> The City of Pleasanton currently has well over 1,200 residential units under construction with hundreds <br /> more in the pipeline. These projects were fully vetted by the community and refinements was made <br /> throughout the process—the refinements are largely seen as improvements by the community and project <br /> applicants. Pleasanton takes a great deal of pride in being the"City of Planned Progress,"with a sharp <br /> focus on urban design principles to ensure a livable community that provides transportation infrastructure, <br /> bilge and pedestrian connectivity and other architectural enhancements that result in projects that are well <br /> integrated into the community. <br /> MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL P.O.Box 520,Pleasanton,CA 94566-0802 <br /> 123 Main Street (9251 931-5001 <br /> Fax: 931-5482 <br /> 37 I Page <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.