My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
051716
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:50:45 PM
Creation date
5/12/2016 8:34:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/17/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15
Document Relationships
15 ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT B - Project Narrative
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\051716
15 ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT B - Proposed Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\051716
15 ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT B - Traffic Study
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\051716
15 ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT B - Tree Reports
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\051716
15 ATTACHMENT 4 EXHIBIT D
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\051716
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
also published in the local newspaper. At the time this report was written, staff had not <br /> received any public comments in response to this notice. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT <br /> An Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved as part of the prior <br /> approval. The modified project is substantially consistent with the previously-approved <br /> project, which was analyzed in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration, as <br /> documented in Exhibit E of Attachment 4. No new information or changed <br /> circumstances have been identified per CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 that would <br /> require supplemental environmental review. Therefore, no supplemental environmental <br /> document accompanies this report. <br /> CONCLUSION <br /> Workday is an important employer in the City of Pleasanton and the proposed project <br /> will allow it to grow and continue to benefit the City. Staff believes the revised site plan <br /> will function well, with efficient on-site circulation, adequate provisions for parking, and <br /> well-designed landscaped features. The revised designs of the office building and <br /> parking garage are attractive and the structures are positioned to create a visual <br /> presence on Stoneridge Mall Road and the freeways without being too dominating. <br /> Affected street intersections will be mitigated to provide for efficient flow and to maintain <br /> acceptable levels of service. The public would benefit from the improved pedestrian <br /> and bicycle access to/from the BART station, the public plaza behind the BART garage, <br /> the joint City/BART police service center, and the new sidewalk to the Stoneridge Mall <br /> Shopping Center. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the proposed modifications. <br /> Submitted by: Fiscal Review: Approved by: <br /> //it— <br /> Gerry Beaudin Tina Olson Nelson Fialho <br /> Director of Director of Finance City Manager <br /> Community Development <br /> Attachments: <br /> 1. Draft City Council Ordinance for PUD-104-1M and PUD-81-22-15M with Exhibit <br /> A, Recommended Conditions of Approval <br /> 2. Exhibit B: Proposed Plans, Project Narrative, Tree Reports, and Traffic Study <br /> 3. Draft Excerpts of the April 13, 2016 Planning Commission meeting minutes <br /> 4. April 13, 2016, Planning Commission Staff Report with the following <br /> Attachments: <br /> • Exhibit C - Ordinance No. 2100 approving PUD-104/PUD-81-22-14M <br /> • Exhibit D - Excerpts of Workday's Previously Approved Plans <br /> • Exhibit E - CEQA Substantial Conformity Memorandum <br /> • Exhibit F - Location and Public Noticing Map <br /> Page 9of9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.