My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
15
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
051716
>
15
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 1:50:45 PM
Creation date
5/12/2016 8:34:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/17/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
15
Document Relationships
15 ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT B - Project Narrative
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\051716
15 ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT B - Proposed Plans
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\051716
15 ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT B - Traffic Study
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\051716
15 ATTACHMENT 2 EXHIBIT B - Tree Reports
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\051716
15 ATTACHMENT 4 EXHIBIT D
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\051716
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
general design and location of the signs to be acceptable. The applicant has provided three <br /> "Welcome to Pleasanton" sign options for the plaza area. The sign options would vary in <br /> shape, height, and colors (due to a printing error, Sign Options 1 and 2 are missing the silver <br /> background color that is proposed). While staff believes they will all provide an attractive <br /> "sense of arrival" for those leaving the BART station, we prefer Option 3 except with the curved <br /> shape of Option 2. Staff also recommends that the font style of the City of Pleasanton logo be <br /> used. A condition has been included that requires the details of the signs to be submitted for <br /> review and approval by the Director of Community Development. <br /> Green Building <br /> As required by the City's Green Building Ordinance, the proposed project is required to meet at <br /> least a LEED (Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design) "Certified" level, which is <br /> equal to a score of 40 or more credit points on the LEED Green Building Checklist for New <br /> Construction and Major Renovations. With the approved project, the applicant incorporated <br /> green building measures to allow it to qualify for at least 55 points, meeting a LEED "Silver" <br /> level with the possible addition of other measures to meet a "Gold" level. With the current <br /> proposal, the applicant is proposing to add sustainability features to allow the project to qualify <br /> for 84 points, meeting a "Platinum" level, the highest level. Some of the proposed green <br /> building measures include: use 40 percent less water than the water use baseline calculated <br /> for the office building, not including irrigation (a 41 percent reduction is proposed); reduce <br /> potable water consumption for irrigation by at least 50 percent from a midsummer baseline <br /> case (a 61 percent reduction is proposed); improve building energy performance at least 48 <br /> percent over baseline; and install on-site renewable energy systems to produce 13 percent of <br /> the building's annual energy cost (photovoltaic panels are proposed). Please see the LEED <br /> checklist on Sheet A7.01 of the development plans for the complete list of the proposed Green <br /> Building items. Staff appreciates that the applicant has significantly increased the green <br /> building measures in the project, including measures to substantially reduce the project's water <br /> demand (annual water savings for the building would be 1,190,000 gallons below baseline and <br /> annual water savings for irrigation would be 7,066,037 gallons below baseline). <br /> Landscaping, Open Space, & Public Plaza <br /> Landscape plans have been provided for the site showing existing and new planter areas <br /> around the buildings and site, including modification of the central landscaped area between <br /> the Stoneridge Corporate Plaza buildings. The landscape plan will provide a variety of trees, <br /> shrubs, and groundcover on the project site. The proposed tree sizes are generous, ranging <br /> from 24-inch-box to 60-inch-box size. Similar to the approved project, the applicant will plant <br /> small-growing trees and shrubs within CalTrans' 22-30-foot wide unpaved right-of-way <br /> between the project site and the edge of the 1-580 freeway paving. <br /> The approved project contained a parking area between the BART garage and freeway. The <br /> modified project replaces approximately half of the parking area with a new public plaza. The <br /> plaza would include concrete paving with planter areas and seat walls, decorative concrete <br /> columns and retaining walls to reduce freeway noise, a "Welcome to Pleasanton" sign, and <br /> bicycle lockers for BART patrons. <br /> Staff believes that the proposed landscape plan is attractive and generally contains sufficient <br /> landscape area around the perimeter of the structures, parking areas, and along the street <br /> frontages. The public plaza behind the BART garage is well designed and will provide an <br /> PUD-104-1M/PUD-81-22-15M, 6110/6120-6160 Stoneridge Mall Road Planning Commission <br /> Page 12 of 17 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.