My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
051716
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:25:12 PM
Creation date
5/11/2016 4:28:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/17/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
05
Document Relationships
05 - ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\051716
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Nagler: The point I'm trying to get at is there is no porch like this in the <br /> neighborhood. The porches in the neighborhood are a much more traditional porch and <br /> so I'm just asking, do you think that the request is inappropriate as an architect or do <br /> you understand the reason for the porch? <br /> Townsend: I understand the request and I also understand that the language is very <br /> vague. It doesn't say in the guidelines anything about size, projection, engaged... It's <br /> just a porch and we have a porch. We proposed a porch. The house next door—I did <br /> that—that has a five-foot porch. Now we're talking 10 foot, eight foot, it's all these <br /> numbers that are very vague that are being circulated. By the way, we have over <br /> 600 square feet of covered porch on this house already where they are going to do their <br /> primary living. <br /> Chair Ritter: All right, thank you. Our last speaker is Gloria Maceiko? <br /> Gloria Maceiko – Neighbor: Thank you. First of all, I'm super happy to hear that the <br /> family members are moving into the neighborhood. We are right behind you on Creek <br /> Trail Drive. One of the main reasons we bought this house is because of the beautiful <br /> view we get from our house of the Pleasanton Ridge and I didn't see any pictures that <br /> project the house against the houses in the neighborhood to see what views would be <br /> blocked along the surrounding homes. So that is my request. <br /> Chair Ritter: Okay, thanks for your feedback. Any other comments? Okay, we'll close <br /> the public hearing and bring it back to the Commission and staff. <br /> THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. <br /> Commissioner Allen: I have a question for Gerry because he started to talk about what <br /> this design might look like and I'm wondering if we could just hear your perspective <br /> given this discussion about a porch and, I think you were ready to design a porch that <br /> would be compatible. <br /> Beaudin: I think Mr. Townsend touched on it. I'm talking about extending the gable <br /> much like Commissioner Nagler was discussing, with 3 columns on the front of the <br /> home. He has already established with the style of architecture the kind of porch that <br /> we're talking about is not out of character. I met with these folks three months or so ago <br /> and we talked about the streetscape and front yard character and we did discuss <br /> porches, and we didn't require a porch at the time. We talked about that as an <br /> architectural detail that's important for the neighborhood. So it's been out there. I <br /> haven't seen the plans a lot since then, but I do think that is an appropriate architectural <br /> feature for the streetscape in this area. <br /> Commissioner Allen: Thank you. <br /> Chair Ritter: Any more questions? This is just proposed for Lot 4. Have they presented <br /> anything on Lot 2 or Lot 1? Or, it is just future zoning? <br /> Weinstein: Future zoning. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 13, 2016 Page 6 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.