My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
05
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
051716
>
05
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:25:12 PM
Creation date
5/11/2016 4:28:53 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/17/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
05
Document Relationships
05 - ATTACHMENT 3
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\051716
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
59
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Townsend: Look at the definition of porch and what is a porch. It is a covered space. <br /> Chair Ritter: Staff, are there any other porches similar to this design in the <br /> neighborhood? Like Mr. Townsend said, there's one around the corner? <br /> Weinstein: Yes, so there's a mixture of housing in the area; a mixture of old homes and <br /> a mixture of new homes. The vast majority of the homes, I think all of the homes built in <br /> the last 15 years or so, have really good sized porches. There are some houses further <br /> down Rose and there are some multi-family residences as well if you go all the way <br /> down Rose, and if you go down Fair towards Division Street, there are also some mid- <br /> century, maybe 1960s-era houses where some of them have good sized porches and <br /> some of them don't; but in the immediate vicinity of this house, every single house has a <br /> porch and they're pretty substantial as well. <br /> Chair Ritter: This porch is in the vicinity, correct? And this is a porch you didn't like? <br /> Townsend: This is what the Commissioner was talking about where you're projecting it <br /> in front of itself. <br /> Chair Ritter: And that's not what you like. <br /> Townsend: Correct. <br /> Chair Ritter: But this is in the neighborhood. <br /> Townsend: This is the tract house around the corner and this is what we don't want to <br /> see and this is what you're going to end up approving. <br /> Weinstein: So we're actually okay with that porch. It's not the most amazing porch in the <br /> world probably, but it fits into the character of the neighborhood. Again, you're just <br /> seeing lots and lots of porches in this neighborhood and I don't want to come across as <br /> an ideologue about porches because it's not something we universally require for new <br /> residences throughout the City. We absolutely don't do that, but when we find <br /> neighborhoods that have a preponderance of porches that have a certain neighborly <br /> character, we really try to be sensitive to designing infill projects that are inserted into <br /> those neighborhoods. So when we see a predominant architectural feature in a <br /> neighborhood, we're really sensitive about seeing if that can be referenced in new <br /> construction so that's what we're trying to do here. <br /> Chair Ritter: Are there any more questions for Mr. Townsend? Then we'll close the <br /> public hearing and bring it back to staff. <br /> Commissioner Nagler: I have one more. This is more of a theoretical question. As an <br /> architect, as you view this neighborhood, do you understand why staff is asking for a <br /> porch? <br /> Townsend: Yes, like I said, we have a porch. <br /> DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, April 13, 2016 Page 5 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.