01 - Laserfiche WebLink

Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Olson, Narum, Mayor Thorne Noes: Councilmember Pentin Absent: None Ms. Hopkins presented on the CDBG Action plan for FY 2016-2017 and provided historical background on how the funding priorities are determined. The plan will include the activities approved in Item 19A. MOTION: It was m/s by to Narum/Olsen to approve Annual Action Plan for the use of Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds and to submit the plan. Motion passed by the following vote: Ayes: Councilmembers Brown, Olson, Narum, Mayor Thorne Noes: Councilmember Pentin Absent: None 20. Public Hearing: PUD-115 Guy Houston - Consider a Planned Unit Development (PUD) Development Plan at 11249 Dublin Canyon Road, allowing for the retention of the existing single- family residence and development of two residential units and related site improvements; and two growth management allocations for the project Planning Manager Adam Weinstein presented a staff report. A PowerPoint Presentation was displayed. The project site was described with a vicinity map. The steep slopes and vegetation coverage provided challenges in developing the site. The project background was described including rezoning in 2006 and other projects previously proposed for the site. The General Plan designation and zoning was described which allows up to two dwelling units per acre. The project does not require a General Plan amendment or rezoning. It will retain the existing residence and construct two new homes. The proposed home sizes were displayed. A private street/driveway would be constructed and four existing trees would be removed and nineteen trees planted. The site plan was displayed along with the lot elevations. The Lot 1 building would be one story. The site landscaping was described. The green corridor along Dublin Canyon would be preserved. The Planning Commission supported the project and specified the meandering pathway to protect the character of the area and upsizing the trees along the street frontage to buffer views. Staff supports the project because of its consistency with the current land use requirements, the development standards are appropriate for the site, and the development limit protects the important landform along Dublin Canyon Road. Councilmember Brown inquired as to the parking for Lot 2. Staff explained the driveway ingress and egress and parking accommodations. Councilmember Brown inquired about the truncated driveway between Lot 2 and 3 where parking could be accommodated. Staff noted that vehicles could park there but it would be limited for circulation purposes. Lot 1 can also use that because it is common space. Councilmember Brown inquired about the storm water retention on the site. Staff stated that the open space will absorb much of the storm water. There are bio retention site proposed along Dublin Canyon Road and materials for the pathways also provide absorption. Councilmember Narum inquired about the designated open space on Lot 2 and how it is memorialized in the conditions of approval. Staff stated that it is memorialized in the Planned Unit Development and in Condition 11. It is not required at this time as a disclosure City Council Minutes Page 6 of 10 April 19,2016