My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
01
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
051716
>
01
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/28/2016 3:34:03 PM
Creation date
5/11/2016 2:56:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
5/17/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
01
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
to send a message to the Council by voting "no" on Measure K. The public can visit <br /> savepleasantonhillsides.com to obtain further information. <br /> Allen Roberts would like to correction misconceptions. Several Council members stated that the <br /> referendum barely qualified for the vote. He recently spoke to the City Clerk who confirmed that <br /> the Registrar of Voters stopped verifying signatures on the submitted petition once the requisite <br /> number of signatures was obtained. He purported there was a large margin of uncounted <br /> signatures which were in support of the measure. Several speakers on June 5th stated that the <br /> developer modified the proposed conditions of approval in order to construct a road in the site's <br /> open space. Also, several lots will infringe on the open space. This seems contradictory as the <br /> "Yes" campaign is supporting the preservation of open space. The proposed project violates its <br /> own conditions of approval by building and grading a road and building lots in areas specifically <br /> designated as open space. He hopes the community will educate itself on this matter, the violation <br /> of Measure PP, and the bad precedent it sets for Pleasanton. Please vote "no" on Measure K. <br /> Carrie Cox commented that the April 12, 2016 meeting on the Costco project on Johnson Drive <br /> was encouraging, in particular Bill Wheeler's initiative efforts to allow the voters a say on whether <br /> Costco should come to Pleasanton. They feel the City should pause and consider that many <br /> residents do not want Costco. There was misinformation given by staff which contradicted the <br /> SEIR. They will analyze each of the points in the audio. She referred to points which were in their <br /> favor including the funding of the infrastructure ($5 million plus $6 million in borrowing for 30-40 <br /> years), lack of approval by CalTrans, no answer to concessions being negotiated even though <br /> Costco has signed a lease, no analysis of break-even, and the City's existing surplus. She <br /> referred to seemingly contradictory remarks made by Councilmembers. She believes the <br /> comments are a gift from the City Council. <br /> Bill Wheeler, owner of Black Tie Transportation, thanked the City Council for the workshop. The <br /> interpretation of the Pleasanton Weekly was different than what other people perceived. They <br /> failed to reflect that thirty people were in opposition to the proposed Costco. The questions at the <br /> workshop were good, but he was concerned they may have confused the public. He expressed <br /> concerns with an opposing ballot initiative for November. His initiative would open the way for <br /> several big box stores of less than 50,000 square feet, and it would still accommodate a hotel and <br /> movie theatres. Something new and unique can be created that will develop jobs and drive the <br /> economy. They are currently in the process of gathering signatures for their ballot measure and <br /> for more information the public can visit www.citizensforplannedgrowth.com. <br /> Bill Lincoln lives in Sycamore Heights, and noted that the June 7th ballot including Measure K was <br /> a grassroots citizen effort. In a period of 26 days there was a collection over 6,000 signatures to <br /> reject the Council's decision despite the Lund ranch developer's efforts to stop the referendum <br /> petition. The three options provided to the Council at the time the referendum certification was <br /> presented were stated. He did not support three Council members decision to put the Lund Ranch <br /> measure on the ballot. The Council will expend $300,000 or more in funds for the election. The <br /> Council majority is pro-growth despite negative impacts. He encouraged the public to vote "no" on <br /> Measure K. <br /> PUBLIC HEARINGS AND OTHER MATTERS <br /> 19. Public Hearing to consider Fiscal Year 2016-17: <br /> (a) Allocations for Housing and Human Services Grant and Community Grant Program Funds <br /> (b) Annual Action Plan for the use of Federal Community Development Block Grant Funds <br /> City Council Minutes Page 4 of 10 April 19,2016 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.