My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
21 ATTACHMENT 6 AND 7
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
041916
>
21 ATTACHMENT 6 AND 7
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 2:23:34 PM
Creation date
4/14/2016 4:02:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/19/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
21
Document Relationships
21
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\041916
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Site Development Standards <br />The proposed development standards are similar to the previously approved <br />developments along Rose Avenue. Table 1 shows the proposed development <br />standards compared to some of the previously- approved developments along Rose <br />Avenue and R -1- 10,000 zoning district. <br />Table 1: Comparison of Site Development Standards <br />1) Height is measured from the lowest finished grade adjacent to the house to the highest point of the roof <br />excluding chimneys. <br />2) FAR for R -1- 10,000 District exclude garage area. <br />Excluding up to 600 square feet of garage area. <br />The Nolan Farm, Roselyn Estates, and Calico Lane developments varied from the R -1- <br />10,000 standards in regard to the setbacks, minimum lot size, building height <br />measurement, and FAR calculation. The proposed PUD would have similar setbacks <br />and building height as these developments on Rose Avenue. <br />PUD -99 Planning Commission <br />6 <br />R -1- 10,000 <br />Nolan <br />Calico Lane <br />Roselyn <br />Proposed <br />Farm <br />Estates <br />Development <br />(PUD -38 <br />and PUD - <br />94 <br />Front Setback <br />Living Area /House <br />23 <br />20 <br />20 <br />20 <br />20 <br />Covered Porch <br />12 <br />12 <br />15 <br />15 <br />15 <br />Garage (Front <br />23 <br />20 <br />23 <br />20 <br />25 <br />Facing) <br />Garage (Side Entry) <br />15 <br />n/a <br />15 (If one <br />15 (Lot 8 of <br />n/a <br />story) <br />PUD -38 <br />only) <br />Rear Yard Setback <br />Living Area /House <br />20 <br />20 <br />20 <br />30 (Lots 1 -5) <br />20 (Lots 6 -17) <br />Creek setback <br />(Lots 18 -19) <br />Side Yard Setback <br />5 min. /20 <br />10 min. /20 <br />10 min. /20 <br />10 min. 120 <br />combined <br />combined <br />combined <br />combined (lot <br />5/15 <br />16: to the <br />Affordable <br />creek setback <br />lots only <br />line) <br />Height <br />30 ft. max <br />30ft. -10 in. <br />22 (one- <br />24 (one- <br />32 <br />story)' <br />story)' <br />30 (two - story)' <br />32 (two - <br />story)' <br />FAR <br />40% <br />40% <br />40% (max.) <br />40% (max.) <br />45% <br />(max. )2 <br />(max. )2 <br />1) Height is measured from the lowest finished grade adjacent to the house to the highest point of the roof <br />excluding chimneys. <br />2) FAR for R -1- 10,000 District exclude garage area. <br />Excluding up to 600 square feet of garage area. <br />The Nolan Farm, Roselyn Estates, and Calico Lane developments varied from the R -1- <br />10,000 standards in regard to the setbacks, minimum lot size, building height <br />measurement, and FAR calculation. The proposed PUD would have similar setbacks <br />and building height as these developments on Rose Avenue. <br />PUD -99 Planning Commission <br />6 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.