My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
21 ATTACHMENT 6 AND 7
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
041916
>
21 ATTACHMENT 6 AND 7
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/30/2016 2:23:34 PM
Creation date
4/14/2016 4:02:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
4/19/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
21
Document Relationships
21
(Message)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\041916
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The proposed landscape plan shows that 68 street trees and approximately 38 front <br />yard trees would be planted in the project. The proposed planting includes various <br />species, such as marina, southern magnolia, purple -leaf plum, Bradford pear, live oak, <br />valley oak, white alder, European hornbeam Leyland cypress, and Saratoga laurel. The <br />proposed street trees would be 24 -inch box size and other trees would be either 24 -inch <br />box or 15- gallon size. <br />In the past, the Planning Commission and /or City Council have attempted to discourage <br />tree loss in developments by adding an extra requirement to contribute the value of the <br />removed trees to the City's Urban Forestry Fund. The Urban Forestry Fund is used to <br />plant new trees in the City as well as to promote conservation and public education <br />about urban forest. Staff normally tries to mitigate tree removal by requiring additional <br />trees be planted on the site beyond what is normally required in production home de- <br />velopments (i.e., street trees and other trees installed in the front yards). In some de- <br />velopments, tree mitigation is required at a 6:1 ratio for each tree removed with a certain <br />percentage of those trees being box - sized. <br />The proposed landscape plan for both phases does not include any additional trees <br />beyond what is typically required for a residential development. There is little room on <br />each lot for additional tree planting. Staff has included a condition that requires the <br />applicant to mitigate the removal of the heritage trees that are in fair and better than fair <br />condition by making a payment to the Urban Forestry Fund. Also, should the applicant <br />increase the size of some or all of the trees that are presently shown on the landscape <br />plan, staff would support reducing the payment to the Urban Forestry Fund <br />proportionately. <br />Noise Assessment <br />The City's General Plan requires new projects to meet acceptable exterior and interior <br />noise level standards. For single - family residential development, private yard areas <br />excluding front yards cannot exceed 60 day /night average decibels (dB Ldp) and indoor <br />noise levels cannot exceed 45 dB Ldp. <br />A noise assessment study was prepared by Illingworth & Rodkin, Inc. to analyze noise <br />created primarily by activities from the fairgrounds. Ambient noise data in and around <br />the project site were collected in November 2015. To ascertain noise generated by the <br />fairgrounds during the Alameda County Fair, the consultant used data collected during <br />the Alameda County Fair in 1998 for the adjoining Roselyn Estates development. As <br />the activities during the fair have remained similar between 1998 and now (i.e., horse <br />racing, bands and concerts, carnivals, fireworks, etc.), staff believes the previous data is <br />still valid to use to assess existing noise conditions. <br />PUD -99 Planning Commission <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.