Laserfiche WebLink
the proposed road in the Lund Ranch development violates Measure PP and will have various negative <br /> impacts on the hillsides. He noted that the opposition to the referendum has stated the referendum <br /> election will cost thousands of dollars. He confirmed that the Council has the option of rescinding the <br /> Ordinance and avoiding an election. He suggested a compromise to the Ventana Hills group and <br /> suggested that all parties, including the developer and the City, focus on a solution that provides the <br /> developer with use of their land in conformance with Measure PP. <br /> Bill Wheeler, owner of Black Tie Transportation, spoke about the Johnson Drive Economic <br /> Development Zone. At a recent Chamber of Commerce meeting, he stated that a representative of <br /> Neuron commented that, "Costco is coming." He expressed concerns that the Planning Commission <br /> staff rejected a project proposal that would better suit the community, even though it would not <br /> generate as much revenue as a Costco. In recent pollings, he stated that many in the Pleasanton <br /> community do not want more big box stores, more crime, more traffic, and more development. Similar <br /> to the Lund Ranch matter, this issue is dividing the community and many do not see the sense in letting <br /> a big corporation dictate what happens with development in Pleasanton. He stated that Vice Mayor <br /> Narum suggested he attend an upcoming workshop on the matter to express his concerns and provide <br /> input, however the date for the workshop keeps moving. In closing, he claimed that people will find <br /> ways to take these matters in their own hands through the ballot box. <br /> Carrie Cox, Cox Family Stores, commented that she attended a Bay Area Air Quality meeting where it <br /> was shared that even though Costco would increase pollution, the organization had no jurisdiction over <br /> the City of Pleasanton. She expressed concerns that even the Supplemental Environmental Impact <br /> Report concludes that the traffic and pollution impacts would be significant. It is her contention that the <br /> City Council is the only legislative body with jurisdiction over this matter and that has the ability to <br /> address the negative impacts that a Costco will bring. This includes 3,000—4,000 cars per day that will <br /> be idling when waiting to fuel and 180 delivery trucks per month. She expressed concern that the City <br /> Council did not care about pollution and was only interested in the revenue. She referenced a recent <br /> newspaper stating that Mayor Thorne was seeking his third term and that he stated in the article that <br /> any proposed Johnson Drive project will have full vetting. She also referenced a comment made by <br /> Neuron that the Costco was a "done deal." <br /> Mayor Thome denied stating that a Costco was "inevitable." He only stated that it was one of the many <br /> possible projects and proposals that could be presented and there will be full public vetting for all. <br /> John Bauer stated that he attended two of the Johnson Drive Economic Development Zone workshops. <br /> City staff listened to concerns, answered all questions and provided handouts and clarifying <br /> information. He felt the key "take aways" from the meeting were that the Johnson Drive Economic <br /> Development Zone was just a proposal and that no changes will be made until a full evaluation is <br /> publically conducted. This will also be the first time this type of Zone would be introduced in the City. <br /> His wife would be happy if a Costco came to Pleasanton. He is waiting for the joint meetings between <br /> the Planning Commission and the City Council and other workshops before he makes his decision. He <br /> read the article that Mayor Thorne is running for his third term, and was shocked by the quote attributed <br /> to Mayor Thorne in the newspaper about "rezoning property on Johnson Drive." Mr. Bauer strongly <br /> suggested that the Zone be fully vetted by the process involving a joint hearing between Planning <br /> Commission and City Council and then more public hearings. He strongly urged Mayor Thome to follow <br /> the process he had previously endorsed. <br /> Mayor Thome stated he is not pushing for any particular business but he would like to see the study <br /> done. <br /> Greg Wohlenberg thanked the volunteer signature gatherers who worked diligently to collect signatures <br /> for the referendum on the Lund Ranch II project. In speaking with residents, he heard a consistent <br /> support for slow and moderate growth and traffic protections throughout the community. They are proud <br /> to be part of the referendum effort and he again sent a thank you to the committed residents. <br /> City Council Minutes Page 3 of 5 February 16,2016 <br />