My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
12a
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
021616
>
12a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/11/2016 4:12:48 PM
Creation date
2/10/2016 3:56:11 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
2/16/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
12a
Document Relationships
12b
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\021616
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BACKGROUND <br /> Prior to December 2002, the City operated under a policy of, with a few exceptions, <br /> providing water and sewer services to existing development outside City boundaries only <br /> for: <br /> a. health and safety reasons; or <br /> b. property within the boundaries of the former Pleasanton Township County Water <br /> District.1 <br /> However, the City began to receive requests for water and sewer service in <br /> unincorporated Happy Valley. Although a majority of Happy Valley residents voted <br /> against annexation, the more limited annexation (inclusive of properties necessary for <br /> development of the municipal golf course) resulted in the construction of water and <br /> sewer systems in Sycamore Road and Alisal Street. Therefore, staff requested policy <br /> guidance from City Council in response to these requests for water and sewer <br /> connections in Happy Valley. <br /> On December 3, 2002, City Council revisited the existing policy regarding service <br /> connections. Council considered four policy options: <br /> 1. Connect only when existing systems serving existing homes fail; <br /> 2. Connect any existing house; <br /> 3. Connect any existing house or new house on an existing, vacant lot; <br /> 4. Connect any existing house or new house on existing or newly subdivided lots. <br /> The agenda report for this December 3, 2002 City Council meeting is attached to this <br /> report as Attachment 3, and provides details on the procedures for service connection <br /> requests prior to December 2002 and associated policy considerations. <br /> After discussing the various options, City Council directed staff to follow policy Option 3 <br /> (connect any existing house or new house on an existing, vacant lot; not provide <br /> connections for newly created lots), with the understanding that City land use and fiscal <br /> policies were to be followed using pre-annexation agreements and other requirements. <br /> Since that time, the City has reviewed requests to provide water and sewer service to <br /> properties outside of the City limits on a case-by-case basis as part of an annexation or <br /> pre-annexation agreement. Once annexed into the City, a property owner may request <br /> to connect to City water and/or sewer services without City Council or LAFCo approval, <br /> subject to the property owner securing permits and paying applicable fees. Pre- <br /> annexation agreements allow a property owner to connect to the City's sewer and water <br /> systems prior to the property being annexed subject to the following requirements: (a) <br /> In the Remen Tract, a handful of sewer connections were approved for lots with existing homes and <br /> existing lots proposed for new homes on the basis that: all lots were lots of record and not newly <br /> subdivided; public sewer mains were located nearby; the properties were located within the Pleasanton <br /> County Township Water District, thus obligating the City to provide services; and the extension of sewer <br /> services to Remen Tract would not substantially induce growth. <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.