Laserfiche WebLink
Significant Impact <br /> Impact 4.4-3: Some residences would be constructed near slopes with colluvial materials. <br /> These slopes, and slopes constructed as part of the project, could become unstable and <br /> potentially result in on- or off-site damage. <br /> Finding <br /> Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which mitigate or <br /> avoid the significant effects on the environment. <br /> Facts in Support of Finding <br /> The City of Pleasanton has adopted the following measures which will reduce potential impacts <br /> related to slopes with colluvial deposits to a less-than-significant level: <br /> Mitigation Measure 4.4-3a: Debris catchment walls shall be constructed along the rear sides <br /> of the building pads on Lots 14, 15, and 22 through 25 where they border adjacent slopes. The <br /> walls shall be a minimum of 5 feet high and designed in accordance with the recommendations <br /> of the geotechnical exploration in regards to retaining walls. Walls may not be required if pad <br /> grading provides sufficient space via rear yard slopes or retaining walls. The final design of the <br /> walls or catchment area shall be reviewed by ENGEO when the detailed project plans are <br /> prepared. Proper access to the catchment areas shall be provided and all debris catchment <br /> walls or designated catchment areas shall be periodically maintained by removing and <br /> disposing of accumulated slope detritus. <br /> Mitigation Measure 4.4-3b: Debris catchment measures shall be constructed along Lots 5 and <br /> 25 which are located at the mouths of existing drainage courses. The catchment measures shall <br /> include a minimum 5-foot berm placed across the mouth of the drainage with clog-resistant <br /> surface drainage inlets provided. The final dimensions, placement, and design shall be <br /> determined in the detailed project plans. <br /> Mitigation Measure 4.4-3c: The final corrective grading plans shall show detailed locations of <br /> keyways, subdrains, debris benches, and subexcavation areas. The sequence of grading <br /> issues, such as placement of various cut materials in specific locations, should also be <br /> evaluated during review of the final 40-scale grading plans. <br /> Mitigation Measure 4.4-3d: The Geotechnical Engineer or qualified representative should be <br /> present during all phases of grading operations to observe demolition, site preparation, grading <br /> operations, and subdrain placement. After grading operations commence, geologic observations <br /> of cut areas should be made at frequent intervals so that revised geologic recommendations <br /> can be incorporated into updated grading plans as grading proceeds. During slope grading, all <br /> cut slopes should be viewed by the Engineering Geologist for adverse bedding, seepage, or <br /> bedrock conditions that may affect slope stability. In the event that adverse conditions are <br /> identified, overexcavation and reconstruction of the slopes may be required. Track rolling to <br /> compact slope faces is not sufficient. All fill slopes should be overbuilt at least two feet and cut <br /> back to design grades. <br /> Mitigation Measure 4.4-3e: Keyways equipped with a subsurface drainage system shall be <br /> constructed. Each keyway shall be keyed into firm natural materials unaffected by shrinkage <br /> cracks. The keyway shall be filled with materials derived from the Livermore Gravels compacted <br /> to 95 percent relative compaction for non-expansive materials and 90 percent relative <br /> compaction for expansive materials. The required depth of the keyways shall be determined in <br /> LUND RANCH II (PUD-25)RESIDENTIAL PROJECT 12 FINDINGS <br />