06 - Laserfiche WebLink

Table 1 summarizes the commercial and residential parking requirements for the project and demonstrates how the project conforms to these requirements as recommended by staff. Please refer to the Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 2) for a more detailed analysis. Table 1: Project Parking Summary Parking Total Total Credit Per Total Spaces Spaces Municipal In-lieu Spaces Requested per Commercial Uses Required Provided Code Staff Recommendation 7* Commercial/Office (Planning Commission recommended Building 14 4 3 no parking credit and 10 in-lieu spaces) Residential Uses Four Multi-family Units 8** 8*** NA N/A One Bedroom Second- NA story Apartment 1 1 N/A Total Project Parking 23 I 13 3 7* *Assumes three space parking credit for demolition of existing building **Two spaces per unit ***Tandem parking proposed (one-car garage space and one driveway space) The Work Session proposal included a total of four parking spaces for each of the four, three-story, multi-family residential units: two within a garage and two within a driveway. Based on general direction provided by the Planning Commission (which encompassed comments on parking, but also other project elements such as building setbacks and size of the commercial space), the applicant elected to reduce the parking dedicated to the four multi-family residential units, in order to expand the size of the commercial/office building and provide four on-site spaces dedicated to that component of the project. The result is that four dedicated parking spaces have been created for the commercial/office building, and each of the four, three-story, multi-family residential units has lost two parking spaces from the Work Session proposal and would rely on tandem parking to meet the minimum Municipal Code requirement of two spaces for each unit. The Municipal Code does not allow tandem parking to be used for meeting prescribed parking requirements. However, PUD zoning allows for flexibility in the prescribed development standards of the Municipal Code. Therefore, if the City Council accepts the tandem parking proposal for the four, three-story, multi-family residential units, the proposed project would meet the minimum Municipal Code requirements prescribed for parking for the residential component of the project. PUD FINDINGS Please refer to the attached Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 2), pages 20 through 23, for a discussion of the considerations needed to approve the proposed PUD Development Plan. Page 9 of 11