My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
020216
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:28:20 PM
Creation date
1/13/2016 4:41:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/19/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06 ATTACHMENT 02
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\020216
06 ATTACHMENT 03
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\020216
06 ATTACHMENT 04
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\020216
06 ATTACHMENT 05
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\020216
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
For further discussion on these topics, please see the Planning Commission meeting <br /> minutes (Attachment 3). After listening to public testimony and discussing the project, <br /> the Commission, on a 3-2 vote (Chair Allen and Commissioner O'Connor dissented), <br /> voted to recommend approval of the project subject to staff's recommended conditions <br /> (Exhibit A, Attachment 1) as revised to require the applicant to pay for the cost of 10 in- <br /> lieu spaces instead of seven spaces and to increase the height of the solid-wood fence <br /> along the northern property line from six feet to eight feet. The Planning Commission did <br /> not support granting the applicant a parking credit for three spaces for the floor area of <br /> the demolished structure as may be allowed per the Municipal Code because the <br /> amount of in-lieu parking requested was deemed excessive for a Downtown location. <br /> Please see Attachment 3 for more details related to public testimony and the Planning <br /> Commission discussion. <br /> DISCUSSION <br /> The Planning Commission staff report (Attachment 2) dated December 9, 2015 provides <br /> additional background information and a detailed discussion of the proposed <br /> application, including project compliance with the General Plan, Downtown Specific <br /> Plan, underlying zoning regulations, and other issues. As discussed in more detail in the <br /> Planning Commission staff report, the Downtown Specific Plan land use designation for <br /> the subject parcel is "Downtown Commercial," which allows pedestrian-oriented <br /> commercial and upper floor office and residential uses (i.e., ground floor residential <br /> uses are generally not desired). Staff believes that the project includes a substantial <br /> pedestrian-oriented commercial presence in the street-facing portion of the site that <br /> meets the intent of the Downtown Commercial designation, even though ground floor <br /> residential uses are located behind the commercial use, away from Spring Street. <br /> This report includes supplemental discussion specific to building height, architectural <br /> design quality, and parking pursuant to the Planning Commission recommendation. <br /> Building Height and Design <br /> The proposed commercial/office/residential building and four, three-story, multi-family <br /> residential units are attractive, well designed and would be a significant architectural <br /> improvement compared to the existing building on the subject parcel. The proposed <br /> buildings have an appropriate scale and mass for Downtown Pleasanton; the proposed <br /> windows and gabled roof parapet elements add interest to the design and reduce <br /> perceived mass. The buildings' colors and materials will be compatible and <br /> complementary with other buildings in the Downtown. <br /> During the review process, the applicant reduced the height of the proposed multi-family <br /> units to 30 feet, which is considered acceptable in most residential zones within the <br /> City. These revisions make the plan consistent with Downtown Specific Plan Land Use <br /> Policy No. 1 that states: "In order to preserve the historic character of the Downtown, <br /> new or remodeled buildings within the Downtown Commercial area should be limited to <br /> two stories, except three-story buildings may be allowed on a case-by-case basis <br /> provided: <br /> Page 7 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.