My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
06
City of Pleasanton
>
CITY CLERK
>
AGENDA PACKETS
>
2016
>
020216
>
06
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/29/2016 4:28:20 PM
Creation date
1/13/2016 4:41:16 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CITY CLERK
CITY CLERK - TYPE
AGENDA REPORT
DOCUMENT DATE
1/19/2016
DESTRUCT DATE
15Y
DOCUMENT NO
06
Document Relationships
06 ATTACHMENT 02
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\020216
06 ATTACHMENT 03
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\020216
06 ATTACHMENT 04
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\020216
06 ATTACHMENT 05
(Attachment)
Path:
\CITY CLERK\AGENDA PACKETS\2016\020216
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ground-level parking space would be designated within the commercial/office building <br /> parking lot solely for use by the occupant(s) of this unit (the parking space would be <br /> designed to be accessible in the event occupants of the units have a disabled person <br /> placard or license plate). All five of the residential units would be rental units and would <br /> be priced at market rates. <br /> The proposed three-story, multi-family residential units are designed to replicate many <br /> of the same architectural features proposed for the commercial/office building, including <br /> both flat and gabled roof parapet lines and smooth cement plaster walls painted off- <br /> white. The design of the residential units is articulated with a significant amount of <br /> windows, and metal deck/balcony railings (Figure 4). The units also include wood and <br /> glass front and garage doors, and solid-colored awnings. Please see the attached <br /> project plans (Exhibit B, Attachment 2) for additional information. <br /> Figure 4: Perspective of Project Looking East <br /> ,.; • <br /> � w r. <br /> �� tr <br /> - <br /> S <br /> .,....ter <br /> _1/4111 1:_ii6,.31 11111 ,..1 \ _. �y . . -. '�. .. - --- <br /> �/■ al ■Ai ! ! � rV- ® Al i k` yl <br /> j. IffirtirrP7 <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION <br /> The Planning Commission held a public hearing on December 9, 2015, to review the <br /> project and provide a recommendation to the Council. Nine members of the public <br /> (including the applicant) spoke. There was a mix of supportive and non-supportive <br /> comments. Objections were raised regarding the proposed multi-family residential units <br /> on the ground-floor; the overall building massing, three-story building height, and <br /> setbacks; and the lack of on-site parking for the commercial building. The adjacent <br /> property owner to the north (multi-family residential building) also requested that a taller <br /> fence be provided along the northern property line. <br /> The Commission focused its debate on several items while considering the project, <br /> including but not limited to: <br /> o massing and scale, <br /> o tandem parking for the multi-family residential units, <br /> o the lack of on-site parking for the commercial building, <br /> o whether some of the residential units should be removed to eliminate the tandem <br /> parking to create two-car garages for the multi-family units and/or create more <br /> parking for the commercial building, <br /> o the appropriate amount of in-lieu parking fees the applicant should pay, and <br /> o whether or not the ground-floor of the commercial building should be restricted to <br /> retail uses only. <br /> Page 6 of 11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.