18 ATTACH 05-06 - Laserfiche WebLink

DRAFT Michael Knuppe stated that he owns Kimberly Commons, the houses directly across the street and the duplex on the corner. He indicated that he is also the owner and developer of the Angela row houses at the other end of the street. He stated that he knows the Peters Avenue corridor very well and thinks the proposed project would fit in and be a great adjunct to that particular corner. He added that it is a great mixed-use project and has merit; the architecture and the design are excellent. Mr. Knuppe stated that his only minor concern is the three ugly garage doors facing Peters Avenue. He indicated that there are no other garage doors facing anywhere on Peters Avenue and proposed that the developer consider leaving the garages open so that people do not put their stuff in the garages or park their cars out in the driveway. He noted that when he first brought his project to the City and asked to put in garage doors, he was told that garage doors were specifically denied on Peters Avenue. Mike Carey stated that he has been a Pleasanton resident since 1973 and have lived Downtown with his wife and three kids. He indicated that he lives, works, and own property within a few doors of this project, so what is built on this site would personally affect his family, his neighbors, and the Downtown community. He stated that they worked really hard and closely with staff for over two years to create a project that they are excited about and believe adds to the vibrancy and beauty of the Downtown. He added that throughout the process, they have strictly followed the set of rules established by the General Plan, the Downtown Specific Plan, the Downtown Design Guidelines, and the zoning district. Mr. Carey stated that the final product is consistent with surrounding properties. He referred to a City map that he earlier handed to the Commissioners and noted the six yellow highlights of approved and built high-density PUD's on Peters Avenue, and the blue highlights of existing commercial/residential mixed-use sites. He referred to a one of the blue highlights, Valley Plumbing, which is a long-time existing business and has nine to eleven residential units behind it which have also been there for a long time. Mr. Carey stated that the final project does not use the PUD process as a variance tool to build more than what is currently acceptable. He indicated that it is far below the height limit allowed, noting that in March 2015, the Planning Commission approved the project next door at 31 feet, 8 inches and three feet from their property line. He noted that they have larger rear yard setbacks than required; it is less dense than the prior approved surrounding properties with five total units at 225 Angela Street, six units at Kimberly Commons across the street, and eight units for the Peters Street Condo Complex diagonally across from the project site. He further noted that their project is approximately the same-sized lot with four units, has four off-street parking spaces when only two are required for the residences, and has a lower floor area ratio (FAR) than what is allowed on the lot. Mr. Carey stated that they worked to create not only what is in the Guidelines but also significantly under the limits in all aspects. He noted that with respect to the pre-existing commercial site, they felt it had a great look and used it as their inspiration for the residences. He added that they created a mini-plaza that will enhance the building and benefit the Downtown, Downtown residents, and the community as a whole, and make it a destination for people to gather. He indicated that they have worked well with staff DRAFT EXCERPT: PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES, 11/182015 Page 5 of 22